Predicting college students' future intentions to engage in public-sphere water conservation behaviors

Keywords: subjective norms, Theory of Planned Behavior, environment


The purpose of this study was to describe selected college students’ (N = 252) perceptions of and future intentions (FI) to engage in public-sphere water conservation behaviors, and to determine if FI could be predicted by a single or linear combination of student demographic characteristics  and latent variables. A majority of respondents agreed a growing population will negatively affect water quantity (90.5%) and there is a need for water resource management (85.6%). A majority disagreed or strongly disagreed that they (53.4%), their family (57.1%), or their friends (67.5%) practiced water conservation, or that people in their hometowns were concerned about local water availability (78.1%). A majority agreed they would engage in four of five public-sphere water conservation behaviors in the future: support water conservation programs (86.4%), care more deeply about water conservation (81.2%), join a water conservation organization (79.2%), and vote for stricter water use laws (55.0%). Fewer than one-half agreed or strongly agreed they would donate money to support water conservation (45.8%). Responses to statements concerning water conservation were factor analyzed and two factors were extracted: lack of agency (LA) and subjective norms (SN). A linear combination of gender, LA, and SN explained 36.7% of the variance in FI. 


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Andenoro, A. C., Baker, M., Stedman, N. L. P., & Weeks, P. P. (2016). Research priority 7: Addressing complex problems. In T. G. Roberts, A. Harder, & M. T. Brashears (Eds.). American Association for Agricultural Education national research agenda: 2016¬–2020. Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.

Arnocky, S., & Stroink, M. L. (2011). Variation in environmentalism among university students: Majoring in outdoor recreation, parks, and tourism predicts environmental concerns and behaviors. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(3), 137–151.

Brand, J. E. (2010). Civic returns to higher education: a note on heterogeneous effects. Social Forces, 89(2), 417–433.

Chaudhary, K. A., Lamm, A., & Warner, L. (2018). Using cognitive dissonance to theoretically explain water conservation intentions. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(4), 194– 210.

Chaudhary, A. K., Warner, L., Lamm, A., Israel, G., Rumble, J., & Cantrell, R. (2017). Using the theory of planned behavior to encourage water conservation among extension clients. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(3), 185–202.

Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2018). Theory and practice of social norms interventions: Eight common pitfalls. Global Health, 14(83), 2–10.

Clark, W. A., & Finley, J. C. (2007). Determinants of water conservation intention in Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. Society and Natural Resources, 20(7), 613–627.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Davis, J. A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. Prentice-Hall.

Ensminger, J., & Knight, J. (1997). Changing social norms: common property, bridgewealth, and clan exogamy. Current Anthropology, 38(1), 1¬–24.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

Field, A., & Miles, J. (2012). Discovering statistics using SAS. Sage Publications, Ltd.

Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–326.

Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Inc.

Koehler, B., & Koontz, T. M. (2008). Citizen participation in collaborative watershed partnerships. Environmental Management, 41(2), 143–154.

Jian, G., & Jeffres, L. (2008). Spanning the boundaries of work: workplace participation, political efficacy, and political involvement. Communication Studies, 59(1), 35–50.

Larson, K. L., & Lach, D. (2010). Equity in urban water governance through participatory, place-based approaches. Natural Resources Journal, 50(2), 407–430.

Larson, K. L., Wutich, A., White, D., Munoz-Erickson, T. A., & Harlan, S. L. (2011). Multifaceted perspectives on water risks and policies: A cultural domains approach in a southwestern city. Human Ecology Review, 18(1), 75–87.

Leander D. K., Gourrier, A. G., Bernick, E. L., & Brekken, K. (2019). County governing boards: Where are all the women? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(1), 39–51.

Mancha, R. M., & Yoder, C. Y. (2015). Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 145–154.

Martinez, T. A., & McMullin, S. L. (2004). Factors affecting decisions to volunteer in non-governmental organizations. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 112–126.

Pradhananga, A. K., Davenport, M., & Olson, B. (2015). Landowner motivations for civic engagement in water resource protection. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(6), 1600–1612.

Stern, P. C. (2002). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

University of Arkansas. (2019). University of Arkansas student degree, enrollment and demographics [Data set].

United States Geological Survey. (2018). Estimated use of water in the United States in 2015. (U.S. Geological Survey Circular No. 1441).

Yong, G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.

How to Cite
Wise, A., Johnson, D., Wardlow, G., & Jogan, K. (2021). Predicting college students’ future intentions to engage in public-sphere water conservation behaviors. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(2), 36-49.