First experiences with participatory climate services for farmers in Central America: A case study in Honduras

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i2.363

Keywords:

climate services, agricultural extension, agricultural innovation, communication, climate variability and change, PICSA

Abstract

While climate services for small-scale farmers are gaining recognition for contributing to adaptation and resilience to climate variability and change, their provision in developing countries remains a critical challenge. Effective climate services consider why and how farmers of varied socioeconomic background make relevant decisions avoiding the traditional prescriptive forms of transfer that merely focus on delivering climate information. Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa shows that climate services for agriculture generates transformations in how farmers access and use climate information, as well as changes in farmer decision-making. In this paper, we address the question of whether the same effect is also seen in Latin America, where farming systems, farming decisions, socioeconomic contexts and non-climate constraints are very different to those of Africa. A group of 209 farmers in the dry corridor in Honduras was studied. We find that 98% of the trained farmers did uptake and use the climate information, and some 73% expressed that the agroclimatic information was key to the success of their harvest despite the challenging 2019 season. Some 43% of the farmers made changes in farming practices. In particular, farmers changed the crop they grew, the crop and land management, the planting dates, inputs and crop varieties. These changes reportedly had positive effects on their food security, and income. These findings support the hypothesis that Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) plays a positive role in providing effective climate services in Central America, improving decision-making, and enabling farmers to make their own decisions based on the analysis of information and their demands regardless of their level of literacy. We pose that participatory climate services in agriculture can catalyse processes of long-term transformation in farming systems, notably through lifting farmers out of poverty and food insecurity and providing an integrated approach to make informed decisions in the face of climatic variation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alpízar, F., Saborío-Rodríguez, M., Martínez-Rodríguez, M. R., Viguera, B., Vignola, R., Capitán, T., & Harvey, C. A. (2020). Determinants of food insecurity among smallholder farmer households in Central America: Recurrent versus extreme weather-driven events. Regional Environmental Change, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01592-y

Bonilla Findji, O., Jarvis, A., Loboguerrero Rodriguez, A. M., & Diarte, N. (2016). CCAFS deep dive assessment of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in the feed the future portfolio in Honduras [Report]. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/81014

Born, L., Prager, S., Ramirez-Villegas, J., & Imbach, P. (2021). A global meta-analysis of climate services and decision-making in agriculture. Climate Services, 22, 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100231

Chiputwa, B., Blundo-Canto, G., Steward, P., Andrieu, N., & Ndiaye, O. (2022). Co-production, uptake of weather and climate services, and welfare impacts on farmers in Senegal: A panel data approach. Agricultural Systems, 195, 103309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103309

Clarkson, G., Dorward, P., Osbahr, H., Torgbor, F., & Kankam-Boadu, I. (2019). An investigation of the effects of PICSA on smallholder farmers’ decision-making and livelihoods when implemented at large scale – The case of Northern Ghana. Climate Services, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.02.002

Clarkson, G., Dorward, P., Poskitt, S., Stern, R. D., Nyirongo, D., Fara, K., Gathenya, J. M., Staub, C. G., Trotman, A., Nsengiyumva, G., Torgbor, F., & Giraldo, D. (2022). Stimulating small-scale farmer innovation and adaptation with Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA): Lessons from successful implementation in Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean and South Asia. Climate Services, 26, 100298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100298

Dayamba, D. S., Ky-Dembele, C., Bayala, J., Dorward, P., Clarkson, G., Sanogo, D., Mamadou, L. D., Traoré, I., Diakité, A., Nenkam, A., Binam, J. N., Ouedraogo, M., & Zougmore, R. (2018). Assessment of the use of Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) approach by farmers to manage climate risk in Mali and Senegal. Climate Services, 12, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2018.07.003

Donatti, C. I., Harvey, C. A., Martinez-Rodriguez, M. R., Vignola, R., & Rodriguez, C. M. (2017). What information do policy makers need to develop climate adaptation plans for smallholder farmers? The case of Central America and Mexico. Climatic Change, 141(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1787-x

Dorward, P., Clarkson, G., & Stern, R. (2015). Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA): Field manual. Walker Institute, University of Reading. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/68687

Dorward, P., Osbahr, H., Sutcliffe, C., & Mbeche, R. (2019). Supporting climate change adaptation using historical climate analysis. Climate and Development, 12(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1642177

Duron, M., Ferrera, R., Obando, D., & Uclés, M. (2021). Municipal Climate Change Adaptation Plan of San Juan Intibucá - Honduras 2021-2026. CGSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114158

El Heraldo. (2019). 41% of the corn harvest was lost during the first season. El Heraldo. https://www.elheraldo.hn/pais/1313775-466/el-41-de-la-cosecha-de-ma%C3%ADz-se-perdi%C3%B3-en-temporada-de

El Mundo. (2019). Planting beans for the postrera harvest is recommended due to the forecast of rain. https://elmundo.hn/recomiendan-sembrar-frijol-para-postrera-ante-solo-60-dias-de-lluvias-intermitentes/

FAO. (2021). Global outlook on climate services in agriculture: Investment opportunities to reach the last mile. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb6941en

FEWS NET. (2019). Harvests from the late season, on average, will contribute to the food reserve of poor households. https://fews.net/es/central-america-and-caribbean/el-salvador-honduras-and-nicaragua/remote-monitoring-report/december-0

Findlater, K., Webber, S., Kandlikar, M., & Donner, S. (2021). Climate services promise better decisions but mainly focus on better data. Nature Climate Change, 11(9), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01125-3

Giraldo Mendez, D. C., Jiménez, G., Obando, D., Clarkson, G., & Dorward, P. (2021). Creating opportunities for young coffee farmers in Honduras using climate services. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/114603

Grossi, A., & Dinku, T. (2022). Enhancing national climate services: How systems thinking can accelerate locally led adaptation. One Earth, 5(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.007

Jaramillo, P. L., Boren-Alpizar, A. E., Morales, S., Burris, S., & Carpio, C. (2021). A love-hate relationship: An ethnographic study of migration with Lenca women in rural Honduras. Migration and Development, 11(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2021.1934022

Keller, M., Zamudio, A. N., Bizikova, L., Sosa, A. R., & Gough, A. M. (2018). Food security and climate change from a systems perspective: Community case studies from Honduras. Climate and Development, 10(8), 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1447901

Kolstad, E. W., Sofienlund, O. N., Kvamsås, H., Stiller-Reeve, M. A., Neby, S., Paasche, Ø., Pontoppidan, M., Sobolowski, S. P., Haarstad, H., Oseland, S. E., Omdahl, L., & Waage, S. (2019). Trials, errors and improvements in co-production of climate services. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100, 1419-1428. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0201.1

Loboguerrero, A. M., Boshell, F., León, G., Martinez-Baron, D., Giraldo, D., Recaman Mejía, L., Díaz, E., & Cock, J. (2018). Bridging the gap between climate science and farmers in Colombia. Climate Risk Management, 22, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.08.001

Lourenço, T. C., Swart, R., Goosen, H., & Street, R. (2015). The rise of demand-driven climate services. Nature Climate Change, 6, 13–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2836

Magaña, V., Amador, J. A., & Medina, S. (1999). The midsummer drought over Mexico and Central America. Journal of Climate, 12(6), 1577–1588. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1577:TMDOMA>2.0.CO;2

Mosso, C., Pons, D., & Beza-Beza, C. (2022). A long way toward climate smart agriculture: The importance of addressing gender inequity in the agricultural sector of Guatemala. Land, 11(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081268

Müller, A., Bouroncle, C., Gaytán, A., Girón, E., Granados, A., Mora, V., Portillo, F., & van Etten, J. (2020). Good data are not enough: Understanding limited information use for climate risk and food security management in Guatemala. Climate Risk Management, 30, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100248

Muller, M., & Sousa, L. D. C. (2020). “She Helps Me All the Time”: Underestimating women’s economic engagement in rural Honduras [SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3582192]. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3582192

Obando, D., Durón, M., Uclés, M., Cid, J. del, Martínez, O., Villagran, E., Lara, N., & Aguilar, V. (2021). Climate Resilience Plan for the National Bean Chain, Honduras. [Report]. Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/113984

Osbahr, H., Dorward, P., Stern, R., & Cooper, S. (2011). Supporting agricultural innovation in Uganda to respond to climate risk: Linking climate change and variability with farmer perceptions. Experimental Agriculture, 47(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479710000785

Paz Delgado, A. C. (2016). Vulnerabilidad de la población del Departamento de Choluteca ante efectos del cambio climático 1988, 2001, Y 2013, [Department of Choluteca Population Vulnerability to the Effects of Climate Changes during 1988, 2001 and 2013; Master's thesis, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras.]. Tegucigalpa.

Phillips, T. (2019, January 15). ‘No way to live here’: New Honduran caravan sets off north as Trump blasts warnings. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/15/new-honduran-caravan-sets-out-north-trump-blasts-warnings

Rodríguez, J. (2020). Agroclimatic Technical Committee: Municipalities of Namasigüe and Orocuina, Honduras. [Report]. Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/113044

Singh, C., Dorward, P., & Osbahr, H. (2016). Developing a holistic approach to the analysis of farmer decision-making: Implications for adaptation policy and practice in developing countries. Land Use Policy, 59, 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.041

Staub, C. G., & Clarkson, G. (2021). Farmer-led participatory extension leads Haitian farmers to anticipate climate-related risks and adjust livelihood strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.029

Stringer, L. C., Fraser, E. D. G., Harris, D., Lyon, C., Pereira, L., Ward, C. F. M., & Simelton, E. (2020). Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007

Vaughan, C., Muth, M. F., & Brown, D. P. (2019). Evaluation of regional climate services: Learning from seasonal-scale examples across the Americas. Climate Services, 15, 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100104

WFP (2019). MVAM Monitoring - University Observatory on Food and Nutritional Security. https://obsan.unah.edu.hn/monitoreo-mvam/

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Giraldo, D., Clarkson, G., Dorward, P., & Obando, D. (2024). First experiences with participatory climate services for farmers in Central America: A case study in Honduras. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 5(2), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i2.363