A discrepancy in discrepancy scores? Comparing the Borich and Ranked Discrepancy Models for determining professional development needs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i4.515Keywords:
measurement theory, statistical theory, research methods, SDG 4: Quality EducationAbstract
The Borich (1980) model has been widely used to determine professional development (PD) needs of school-based agricultural education (SBAE) teachers over the past 40-plus years. However, recent criticism, primarily focused on a purported statistical issue, has led to development of the Ranked Discrepancy Model [RDM (Narine & Harder, 2021)] as a potential alternative. This article provides perspective on the statistical issue in question and compares the results of using the Borich model and the RDM to assess precision agriculture (PA) PD needs of Arkansas SBAE teachers (N = 44). Our quantitative results indicated the two models produced different PD priorities, especially among the highest rated priorities. The mean weighted discrepancy scores [MWDSs (Borich model)] and the ranked discrepancy scores [RDSs (RDM)] had a shared variance of 54.8%; the PD priority rankings established by the two methods had a shared variance of 47.6%. Additionally, the number of tied priorities with the RDM complicated identifying priority PD workshop topics. We recommend further research and dialogue before wholesale abandonment of the Borich model for the RDM as a method of determining PD needs.
Downloads
References
Akwah, H. O. (2024). Inservice needs of selected Arkansas agriculture teachers related to precision agriculture systems.[Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas]. Scholarworks@UARK. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5373/
Barrick, R. K. (1989). Agricultural education: Building upon our roots. Journal of Agricultural Education, 30(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1989.04024
Barrick, R. K., Ladewig, H. W., & Hedges, L. E. (1983). Development of a systematic approach to identifying technical inservice needs of teachers. Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 24(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.5032/jaatea.1983.01013
Borich, G. D. (1980). A needs assessment model for conducting follow-up studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718003100310
Dyer, J. E., Haase-Wittler, P. S., & Washburn, S. G. (2003). Structuring agricultural education research using conceptual and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Agricultural Education, 44(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2003.02061
Gaito, J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of old misconceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 87(3), 564–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.564
Garton, B. L., & Chung, N. (1997). An assessment of the inservice needs of beginning teachers of agriculture using two assessment methods. Journal of Agricultural Education, 38(3), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1997.03051
Gates, H. R., Johnson, D. M., & Shoulders, C. W. (2018). Instrument validity in manuscripts published in the Journal of Agricultural Education Between 2007 and 2016. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.03185
Harwell, M. R., & Gatti, G. G. (2001). Rescaling ordinal data to interval data in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001105
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5116
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them? Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
Johnson, D. M., Schumacher, L. G., & Stewart, B. R. (1990). An analysis of the agricultural mechanics laboratory management inservice needs of Missouri agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 31(2), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1990.02035
Lord, F. M. (1953). On the statistical treatment of football numbers. American Psychologist, 8, 750–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063675
Narine, L., & Harder, A. (2021). Comparing the Borich model with the ranked discrepancy model for competency assessment: A novel approach. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(3), 96–11. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i3.169
Newman, M. E., & Johnson, D. M. (1994). Inservice education needs of teachers of pilot agriscience courses in Mississippi. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1994.01054
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement, and “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Roberts, T. G., Harder, A., & Brashears, M. T. (Eds). (2016). American Association for Agricultural Education national research agenda: 2016-2020. Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.
Smalley, S. W., Hainline, M. S., & Sands, K. (2019). School-based agricultural education teachers’ perceived PD needs associated with teaching, classroom management, and technical agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02085
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of measurement scales. Science, 103 (2684), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677
Zumbo, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by the level of measurement? Canadian Psychology, 43(4), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078865
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Donald M. Johnson, Will Doss, Christopher M. Estepp, Henry O. Akwah, George W. Wardlow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Grant numbers 1024473