Behavioural drivers and barriers for adopting climate mitigation actions on dairy farms

Niamh Dunphy; Seamus Kearney; Sinéad Flannery

doi:10.37433/aad.v6i4.583

Authors

Niamh Dunphy University College Dublin, Ireland https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4603-170X
Seamus Kearney Teagasc Dungarvan Local Advisory Office, Shandon, Dungarvan, Co. Waterford, Ireland. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2767-2390
Sinéad Flannery University College Dublin, Ireland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-975X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v6i4.583

Keywords:

SDG 13: Climate Action, climate change, farmers, behavior change

Abstract

The adoption of climate mitigation actions on farms has the potential to lessen the effects of climate change on agriculture. The purpose of this study is to identify the behavioural drivers and barriers for adopting climate mitigation actions on dairy farms. This study employed a qualitative methodological approach consisting of 24 semi–structured interviews with dairy farmers in the republic of Ireland. This study provides insights into the drivers and barriers for the adoption of climate mitigation actions at farm level. An increase in workload, being sceptical of the benefits of mitigation actions, and increases in costs incurred were the three biggest barriers for adopting climate mitigation actions at farm level. An increase in revenue and farm productivity, wanting to benefit the environment, and advisory support were the three biggest drivers when adopting climate mitigation actions on farm. From the findings of this study, policy and Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS) recommendations are offered. A call for policies that subsidise the cost of mitigation actions for farmers and promote actions that reduce workload levels on farms are proposed. AKIS recommendations on how agricultural advisors can support farmers when implementing mitigation actions are also offered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnes, A. P., & Toma, L. (2012). A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Climatic Change, 112, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–011–0226–2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0226-2

Brown, C., Kovács, E., Herzon, I., Villamayor–Tomas, S., Albizua, A., Galanaki, A., Grammatikopoulou, I., Mccracken, D., Olsson, J. A., & Zinngrebe, Y. (2021). Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy. Land Use Policy, 101, 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105136

Burrell, A. M., Balaine, L., Clifford, S., Mcgrath, M., Graham, D. A., Mccoy, F., Dillon, E., & Regan, Á. (2024). A multi–methods, multi–actor exploration of the benefits and barriers to milk recording on Irish farms using the com–b model. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 227, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106195

Carlock, R. S. (2007). Leadership coaching in family businesses. Coach and couch: The psychology of making better leaders. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1–137–56161–9_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56161-9_11

Cofré–Bravo, G., Klerkx, L., & Engler, A. (2019). Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004

Cooreman, H., Vandenabeele, J., Debruyne, L., Ingram, J., Chiswell, H., Koutsouris, A., Pappa, E., & Marchand, F. (2018). A conceptual framework to investigate the role of peer learning processes at on–farm demonstrations in the light of sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 6, 91–103.

Creighton, P., Kennedy, E., Shalloo, L., Boland, T., & O’donovan, M. (2011). A survey analysis of grassland dairy farming in ireland, investigating grassland management, technology adoption and sward renewal. Grass and Forage Science, 66(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2494.2011.00784.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00784.x

Crudeli, L., Mancinelli, S., Mazzanti, M., & Pitoro, R. (2022). Beyond individualistic behaviour: Social norms and innovation adoption in rural Mozambique. World Development, 157, 105928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.10592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105928

CSO. (2020). Census of agriculture 2020 – preliminary results. Central Statistic Office. https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p–coa/censusofagriculture2020–preliminaryresults/demographicprofileoffarmholders/

Darnhofer, I. (2020). Farming from a process‐relational perspective: Making openings for change visible. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12294

Dunphy, N., Flannery, S., & Kearney, S. (2025). Development of an agricultural extension support tool to support farmer engagement in conversations about climate change. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2025.2477450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2025.2477450

Erbach, G. (2021). European climate law. Regulation (EU), 1119. https://www.univiu.org/images/aauniviu2017/GP/co–curr/European_climate_law.pdf

Farrell, S., Benson, T., Mckernan, C., Regan, Á., Burrell, A. M., & Dean, M. (2023). Factors influencing dairy farmers' antibiotic use: An application of the com–b model. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(6), 4059–4071. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022–22263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22263

Farstad, M., Melås, A. M., & Klerkx, L. (2022). Climate considerations aside: What really matters for farmers in their implementation of climate mitigation measures. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.003

Garforth, C., Angell, B., Archer, J., & Green, K. (2003). Fragmentation or creative diversity? Options in the provision of land management advisory services. Land Use Policy, 20(4), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264–8377(03)00035–8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00035-8

Habib–Ur–Rahman, M., Ahmad, A., Raza, A., Hasnain, M. U., Alharby, H. F., Alzahrani, Y. M., Bamagoos, A. A., Hakeem, K. R., Ahmad, S., & Nasim, W. (2022). Impact of climate change on agricultural production: Issues, challenges, and opportunities in Asia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 925548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.925548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.925548

Hatfield, J. L., Boote, K. J., Kimball, B. A., Ziska, L., Izaurralde, R. C., Ort, D., Thomson, A. M., & Wolfe, D. (2011). Climate impacts on agriculture: Implications for crop production. Agronomy journal, 103(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0303

Lal, R. (2020). Advancing climate change mitigation in agriculture while meeting global sustainable development goals. Soil and Water Conservation: A Celebration of 75 Years. https://www.swcs.org/static/media/cms/75th_Book__Chapter_2_FE50D48CBC96F.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2020.0620A

Lane, D., Chatrchyan, A., Tobin, D., Thorn, K., Allred, S., & Radhakrishna, R. (2018). Climate change and agriculture in New York and Pennsylvania: Risk perceptions, vulnerability and adaptation among farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000710

Lanigan, G., Black, K., Donnellan, T., Crosson, P., Beausang, C., Hanrahan, K., Buckley, C., Lahart, B., Herron, J., Redmond, J., & Shalloo, L. (2023). MACC 2023: An updated analysis of the greenhouse gas abatement potential of the Irish agriculture and land–use sectors between 2021 and 2030. Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland.

Leader, A., Kinsella, J., & O’Brien, R. (2024). Making sense of farmland biodiversity management: An evaluation of a farmland biodiversity management communication strategy with farmers. Agriculture and Human Values, 41, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460–024–10573–4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10573-4

Le Dang, H., Li, E., Bruwer, J., & Nuberg, I. (2014). Farmers’ perceptions of climate variability and barriers to adaptation: Lessons learned from an exploratory study in Vietnam. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 19, 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027–012–9447–6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9447-6

Liu, Z., Smith, W. J., & Safi, A. S. (2014). Rancher and farmer perceptions of climate change in Nevada, USA. Climatic Change, 122, 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–013–0979–x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0979-x

Mankad, A. (2016). Psychological influences on biosecurity control and farmer decision–making. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 36, 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593–016–0375–9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0375-9

McDonagh, L. K., Saunders, J. M., Cassell, J., Curtis, T., Bastaki, H., Hartney, T., & Rait, G. (2018). Application of the Com–B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012–018–0821–y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0821-y

Michie, S., Van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748–5908–6–42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., Dwyer, J., Reed, M., & Short, C. (2017). Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values, 34, 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460–016–9705–4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4

Mitter, H., Larcher, M., Schönhart, M., Stöttinger, M., & Schmid, E. (2019). Exploring farmers’ climate change perceptions and adaptation intentions: Empirical evidence from Austria. Environmental Management, 63, 804–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267–019–01158–7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01158-7

Moerkerken, A., Blasch, J., Van Beukering, P., & Van Well, E. (2020). A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures. Climatic Change, 159, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–019–02595–3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3

Momenpour, Y., Choobchian, S., & Haji, L. (2024). Farmers' intention to adopt low–carbon agricultural technologies to mitigate climate change. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 23, 100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100432

Moojen, F. G., Grillot, M., De Faccio Carvalho, P. C., & Ryschawy, J. (2024). Farm advisors play a key role in integrating crop–livestock at the farm level: Perceptions and experiences in Brazil and France. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 30(5), 683–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2023.2254308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2023.2254308

Murphy, K., Berk, J., Muhwava–Mbabala, L., Booley, S., Harbron, J., Ware, L., Norris, S., Zarowsky, C., Lambert, E. V., & Levitt, N. S. (2023). Using the com–b model and behaviour change wheel to develop a theory and evidence–based intervention for women with gestational diabetes (Indiago). BMC Public Health, 23, 894. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889–023–15586–y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15586-y

O’Connor, T., Meredith, D., McNamara, J., O’Hora, D., & Kinsella, J. (2021). Farmer discussion groups create space for peer learning about safety and health. Journal of agromedicine, 26(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2020.1720882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2020.1720882

Ohman, A. (2005). Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(5), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040056

Opoku, A. (2016). SDG2030: A sustainable built environment’s role in achieving the post–2015 United Nations sustainable development goals. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 2016. Association of Researchers in Construction Management Manchester, UK, 1149–1158. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alex–Opoku–2/publication/307906714_SDG2030_A_SUSTAINABLE_BUILT_ENVIRONMENT'S_ROLE_IN_ACHIEVING_THE_POST–2015_UNITED_NATIONS_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT_GOALS/links/57d14afb08ae6399a38b401f/SDG2030–A–SUSTAINABLE–BUILT–ENVIRONMENTS–ROLE–IN–ACHIEVING–THE–POST–2015–UNITED–NATIONS–SUSTAINABLE–DEVELOPMENT–GOALS.pdf

Oreszczyn, S., Lane, A., & Carr, S. (2010). The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers' engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.003

Prokopy, L. S., Floress, K., Klotthor–Weinkauf, D., & Baumgart–Getz, A. (2008). Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/63.5.300

Regan, Á., Douglas, J., Maher, J., & O’Dwyer, T. (2021). Exploring farmers’ decisions to engage in grass measurement on dairy farms in Ireland. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1858892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1858892

Roesch–McNally, G. E., Basche, A. D., Arbuckle, J. G., Tyndall, J. C., Miguez, F. E., Bowman, T., & Clay, R. (2018). The trouble with cover crops: Farmers’ experiences with overcoming barriers to adoption. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000096

Sachs, J. D., Schmidt–Traub, G. & Durand–Delacre, D. (2016). Preliminary sustainable development goal (SDG) index and dashboard. SDSN Working Paper. https://planbleu.org/sites/default/files/upload/files/160215–Preliminary–SDG–Index–and–SDG–Dashboard–working–paper–for–consultation.pdf

Statista. (2024). Agriculture emissions worldwide – statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/10348/agriculture–emissions–worldwide/#:~:text=In%202023%2C%20agricultural%20processes%20like,percent%20of%20global%20GHG%20emissions

Teevan, C., Medinilla, A., & Sergejeff, K. (2021). The Green Deal in EU foreign and development policy. ECDPM Briefing Note, 131. https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/green–deal–eu–foreign–development–policy–ecdpm–briefing–note–131–2021.pdf

Tensi, A. F., Ang, F., & Van der Fels–Klerx, H. J., 2022. Behavioural drivers and barriers for adopting microbial applications in arable farms: Evidence from the Netherlands and Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121825

Vanclay, F., & Lawrence, G. (1994). Farmer rationality and the adoption of environmentally sound practices: A critique of the assumptions of traditional agricultural extension. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 1(1), 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249485300061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249485300061

Wang, Q., Yu, L., Yang, Y., Zhao, H., Song, Y., Song, W., & Liu, J. (2022). Let the farmers embrace “carbon neutrality”: Taking the centralized biogas as an example. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159677

World Economic Forum. (2021). What you need to know about the European Green Deal – and what comes next. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/what–you–need–to–know–about–the–european–green–deal–and–what–comes–next/