Factors influencing Tennessee farmers’ adoption of technology: A survey of Tennessee agricultural enhancement program participants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v6i3.647Keywords:
adoption, technology, farmers, SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, & InfrastructureAbstract
Farmers adopt new technologies to be competitive and farm efficiently. This study explored what factors influence technology adoption among row crop and livestock farmers in Tennessee. Utilizing Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory, this study investigated the impact of economic benefits, cost, peer influence, compatibility, and demographic characteristics on the adoption decisions of farmers. This study employed a mixed-methods approach by combining the Delphi technique and survey research. Thirty experts participated in the Delphi and 675 farmers completed the quantitative instrument. The results of the Delphi study provided a list of technologies that farmers are currently looking to adopt along with what promotes and hinders adoption. Survey research revealed that economic benefits are the most influential factor in adoption, while cost and compatibility can serve as barriers. Demographic characteristics such as education level, farm size, farm income, and years of experience significantly influence adoption decisions. Binary logistic regression and Bayesian regression analyses indicated that adopter categories, innovativeness, economic factors, demographics, and socioeconomic factors significantly influence adoption decisions. The conceptual model developed from this study suggests the inclusion of various influential factors to improve the predictability of adoption decisions.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bellon, M. R., & Reeves, J. (Eds.) (2002). Quantitative analysis of data from participatory methods in plant breeding. CIMMYT. https://books.google.com/books?id=iIGFJr4zz-EC
Bonabana-Wabbi, J. (2002). Assessing factors affecting adoption of agricultural technologies: The case of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Kumi District, Eastern Uganda (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech). http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36266
Carlisle, L. (2016). Factors influencing farmer adoption of soil health practices in the United States: A narrative review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 40(6), 583-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2016.1156596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2016.1156596
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287%2fmnsc.9.3.458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method--2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Doran, E. M., Zia, A., Hurley, S. E., Tsai, Y., Koliba, C., Adair, C., Schattman, R. E., Rizzo, D. M., & Méndez, V. E. (2020). Social-psychological determinants of farmer intention to adopt nutrient best management practices: Implications for resilient adaptation to climate change. Journal of Environmental Management, 276, 111304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111304
Edison, S. W., & Geissler, G. L. (2003). Measuring attitudes towards general technology: Antecedents, hypotheses, and scale development. Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing, 12, 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1057%2fpalgrave.jt.5740104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740104
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387
Karlan, D., Osei, R., Osei-Akoto, I., & Udry, C. (2014). Agricultural decisions after relaxing credit and risk constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 597-652. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju002
Kinyangi, A. A. (2014). Factors influencing the adoption of agricultural technology among smallholder farmers in Kakamega north sub-county, Kenya [Doctoral dissertation, University ofrobi]. https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/76086
Li, H., Huang, D., Ma, Q., Qi, W., & Li, H. (2019). Factors influencing the technology adoption behaviours of litchi farmers in China. Sustainability, 12(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390%2fsu12010271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010271
Lindner, J. R. (2002). Handling of nonresponse error in the Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 9(3), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2002.09307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2002.09307
Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043
Loevinsohn, M., Sumberg, J., Diagne, A., & Whitfield, S. (2013). Under what circumstances and conditions does adoption of technology result in increased agricultural productivity? A systematic review (Version 1). The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/3208
McNeish, D. (2016). On using Bayesian methods to address small sample problems. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 750-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1186549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1186549
Meijer, S. S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G. W., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2015). The role of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493
Mwangi, M., & Kariuki, S. (2015). Factors determining adoption of new agricultural technology by smallholder farmers in developing countries. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(5). https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS
Nyairo, N., Pfeiffer, L., & Russell, M. (2021). Smallholder farmers’ perceptions of agricultural extension in adoption of new technologies in Kakamega County, Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 9(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.33687%2f009.01.3510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.009.01.3510
Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(11), 1407-1424. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea05037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press Simon & Schuster Inc.
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324%2f9780203710753-35
Smith, A. (2012). Wealth of nations. Wordsworth Editions.
Takahashi, K., Muraoka, R., & Otsuka, K. (2020). Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries' agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539
Wright, V. (2004). How do land managers adopt scientific knowledge and technology? Contributions of the Diffusion of Innovations theory. In: N. Munro, P. Dearden, T. B. Herman, K. Beazley, & S. Bondrup-Nielson, (Eds.). Making ecosystem-based management work: Proceedings of the Fifth international conference on science and management of protected areas. SAMPAA. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_journals/2004/rmrs_2004_wright_v002.pdf
Yaseen, M., Manzoor, R., Shabbir, M., Hussain, S., & Maqsood, A. (2023). A review on adoption of technology and its impact on agricultural productivity. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(3), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014792
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Danny Morris, John C. Ricketts, David Hochreiter

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Grant numbers 2023-70440-40157;2023-38821-39944