Characteristics of effective instruction and student engagement:  A case study of two exemplary Florida agriculture teachers

Casey Gilbert; R. G. Easterly III; J. C. Bunch; Sebastian Galindo; Jason Dossett

doi:10.37433/aad.v4i1.273

Authors

Casey Gilbert Lanier College and Career Academy, Georgia, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-6575
R. G. (Tre) Easterly III University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2807-512X
J. C. Bunch University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8729-2349
Sebastian Galindo University of Florida, USA
Jason Dossett University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-7372

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v4i1.273

Keywords:

qualitative observation, effective teaching practices, Student Content Engagement Model

Abstract

Student disengagement has been an ongoing problem for educators in the United States. Engaging students is critical to ensuring students see the value of their education. The purpose of this exemplar case study was to understand how effective teaching impacts student engagement of high school agriculture students in Florida. Two Florida agriculture teachers, identified as exemplary agriculture teachers, and 22 students served as participants. Three methods of data collection were involved in this study: teacher interviews, student focus groups, and teacher observations. The top five characteristics of effective teaching described by Rosenshine and Furst (1971) were used as a priori themes for the data analysis. These characteristics were clarity, variety, enthusiasm, business and/or task-oriented behaviors, and student opportunity to learn criterion material. The teachers used all five of the characteristics to engage students. Students reported high levels of engagement and positive feelings about class. Further studies should be conducted to replicate the study with a larger group of exemplary agriculture teachers. The study recommends that teacher educators considering teaching pre-service teachers how to demonstrate the characteristics of effective instruction to impact engagement. We recommend agriculture teachers consider reflecting on their use of the characteristics of effective instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baines, L., & Stanley, G. (2003). Disengagement and loathing in high school. Educational Horizons, 81(4), 165-168SAGE Publications. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42925454

Benner, M., Brown, C., & Jeffrey, A. (2019). Elevating student voice in education. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2019/08/14/473197/elevating-student-voice-education.

Carlson, P., Martinez, R., & Lasater, M. (2011). Student disengagement: A national concern from local perspective. National Social Science Proceedings, 48, 54–70. https://www.nssa.us/journals/pdf/NSS_Proceedings_2011_New_Orleans.pdf#page=57

Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Lincoln and Guba’s evaluative criteria. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. http://www.qualres.org/HomeLinc-3684.html

De Lay, A. M., & Swan, B. G. (2014). Student apathy as defined by secondary agricultural education students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.01106

DiBenedetto, C. A., Easterly III, R. G., & Myers, B. E. (2015). Can scientific reasoning scores predict the likelihood of SBAE students' intent to pursue a STEM career, a career in agriculture, or plan to attend college? Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(1), 103–115. http://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.01103

Edgar, D. W., Retallick, M. S., & Jones, D. (2016). Research priority 4: Meaningful, engaged learning in all environments. In T.G. Roberts, A. Harder, & M.T. Brashears (Eds). (2016). American Association for Agricultural Education National Research Agenda: 2016-2020 (pp. 1–6). Department of Agricultural and Communication.

Estepp, C. M., & Roberts, T. G. (2013). Teacher behaviors contributing to student content engagement: A socially constructed consensus of undergraduate students in a college of agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.01097

Fernandez, J. M., Goecker, A. D., Smith, E., Moran, E. R., & Wilson, C. A. (2020). Employment opportunities for college graduates in food, agriculture, renewable natural resources and the environment, United States, 2020-2025: Report Summary. https://www.purdue.edu/usda/employment/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/USDA-2020-25-Employment-Report-Summary.pdf

Friedel, C. R., & Anderson II, J. C. (2017). An exploration of relationships between teaching practices in secondary agricultural education programs and student engagement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.02180

Hodges, T. (2018). School engagement is more than just talk. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/education/244022/school-engagement-talk.aspx

Kuhn, E. (2020). 5 Ways to engage today’s agriculture students. Reality Works. https://www.realityworks.com/5-ways-to-engage-todays-agriculture-students/

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

McLaughlin, M., McGrath, D. J., Burian-Fitzgerald, M. A., Lanahan, L., Scotchmer, M., Enyeart, C., & Salganik, L. (2005). Student content engagement as a construct for the measurement of effective classroom instruction and teacher knowledge. American Institutes for Research. https://doi.org/10.1037/e539752012-001

Medelyan, A. (2020). Coding qualitative data: How to code qualitative research. Thematic. https://getthematic.com/insights/coding-qualitative-data/

National FFA Organization. (2019). Agricultural education about FFA. National FFA. https://www.ffa.org/agricultural-education/.

Quin, D., Hemphill, S. A., & Heerde, J. A. (2017). Associations between teaching quality and secondary students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement in school. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 807–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9401-2

Roberts, T. G., & Ball, A. L. (2009). Secondary agricultural science as content and context for teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 50(1), 81–91. http://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2009.01081

Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1971). Research on teacher performance criteria. In B. O. Smith (Ed.), Research in teacher education: A symposium. Prentice-Hall.

Van Uden, J., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. (2014) Engaging students: The role of teacher beliefs and interpersonal behavior in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.08.005

Washor, E., & Mojkowski, C. (2014). Student disengagement: It's deeper than you think. Phi Delta Kappa International. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171409500803