The communication preferences of University of Idaho Extension professionals and their constituents

Klae D. O'Brien; Sarah A. Bush; Kattlyn J. Wolf; Maggie Elliot

doi:10.37433/aad.v4i4.393

Authors

Klae D. O'Brien University of Idaho, USA
Sarah A. Bush University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-7037
Kattlyn J. Wolf University of Idaho, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-6734
Maggie Elliot Washington Hops Commission, Washington, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v4i4.393

Keywords:

communication channels, communication types, census survey, COVID-19

Abstract

As Cooperative Extension Services (CES) grow, agriculture evolves, and urbanization increases, Extension professionals are challenged to continue meeting the needs of their constituents by providing reliable, research-backed information to their communities. This includes utilizing appropriate communication means to reach their constituents. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the communication preferences of University of Idaho CES professionals and their constituents and the communication types and channels most used. We used a cross-sectional descriptive census survey design and administered the survey to all University of Idaho CES faculty and educators. We analyzed the data via descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and paired sample t-tests. University of Idaho CES professionals ranked mainly individual communication channels as their preferred method of communication. However, they felt their constituents may prefer mass or group communication channels more than they do. CES professionals should utilize audience segmentation to serve their constituents better. COVID-19 also significantly increased the time spent preparing communications and utilizing mass communications. While technological-based communication increased during COVID-19, it is important to consider access and availability to constituents. Understanding what resources constituents have available and how they prefer to receive their information, can help CES professionals maintain relationships with their audiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agunda, R. (1989). Communicating with the audience in mind. Journal of Applied Communications, 73(2), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1532

Curtis, K. J., Veroff, D., Rizzo, B. & Beaudoin, J. (2012). Making the case for demographic data in extension programming. Journal of Extension, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.03.66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.03.66

Daamen, D. D., Staats, H., Wilke, H. A. M., & Engelen, M. (2001). Improving environmental behavior in companies: The effectiveness of tailored versus nontailored interventions. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972963

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Economic Research Service [ERS]. (2020, December 16). Ag Sectors and the Economy. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy/

Henning, J., Buchholz, D., Steele, D., & Ramaswamy, S. (2014). Milestones and the future for cooperative extension. Journal of Extension, 52(6). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2014december/comm1.php

Jenkins, A. E., Grygorcyzk, A., & Boecker, A. (2020). Science communication: Synthesis of research findings and practical advice from experience communicators. Journal of Extension, 58(4). hhttps://doi.org/10.34068/joe.58.04.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.58.04.01

Kurtzo, F., Edgar, L. D., & Edgar, D. W. (2019). Exploring communication tendencies of program facilitators. Journal of Applied Communications, 103(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1415

Lamm, K. W., Rumble, J. N., Carter, H. S., & Lamm, A. J. (2016). Agricultural opinion leader communication channel preferences: An empirical analysis of participants of agricultural and natural resource leadership development programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.01091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.01091

Licht. A. R. & Martin, R. A. (2007). Communication channel preferences of corn and soybean producers. Journal of Extension, 45(6). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2007december/rb2.php

Linder, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043

McDowell, E. E., & Mizuno, L. J., (1987). Communication skills important to Minnesota county agents. Journal of Applied Communication, 70(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1574

Narine, L., & Meier, C. (2020). Responding in a time of crisis: Assessing extension efforts during COVID-19. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 1(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v1i2.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v1i2.35

National Institute of Food and Agriculture [NIFA]. (2021). Cooperative extension system. https://nifa.usda.gov/cooperative-extension-system

Ray, J., Baker, L. M. & Settle, Q. (2015). Ask the audience: Determining organizational identity of a state extension agency. Journal of Applied Communications, 99(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1061

Robinson, P. (2013). Effectively communicating science to extension audiences. Journal of Extension, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.51.02.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.51.02.02

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

Rumble, J., Lawson, C., & Lundy, L. (2022). Effective communication, audience analysis, and message development. In R. Telg, T. Irani, K. Kent, & L. Lundy (Eds.), Agricultural and Natural Resources Communications. https://rise.articulate.com/share/ZBfCq-9jt2nV1LQyFgEnueJ23SqPUvxs#/

Seevers, B. & Graham, D. (2012). Education through cooperative extension. University of Arkansas.

Webster, N., & Ingram, P. (2007). Exploring the challenges for extension educators working in urban communities. Journal of Extension, 45(3). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2007june/iw3.php