Immersive experiences in agriculture for STEM teachers

Alexis Zickafoose; Kellie Claflin

doi:10.37433/aad.v7i3.677

Authors

Alexis Zickafoose The Ohio State University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-3640
Kellie Claflin The Ohio State University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-1742

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v7i3.677

Keywords:

field trips, pedagogy, professional development, program evaluation, SDG 4: Quality Education

Abstract

The implementation of ChLOE at Ohio State University provided science teachers with authentic agricultural experiences for integrating agriculture in their classes through a professional development session and field trip with their students. The purpose of this explanatory mixed-methods study is to evaluate the ChLOE’s impact on teacher participants’ knowledge, beliefs, and application of the program content. The quantitative questionnaire indicated that the program was beneficial for students and teachers through the reported implementation of the pedagogies taught during the professional development and immersive experiences during the field trip. The qualitative follow-up interviews indicated that teachers perceived high student engagement during the field trip and a plethora of intended and reported behavior change through the integration of professional development and field trip within the classroom. The expansion on the quantitative results by the qualitative suggests that the behavior changes are congruent with the additional beliefs and knowledge acquired by the teachers throughout the ChLOE program. OSU should align educator programs, including ChLOE, with evolving teacher needs and evaluate student outcomes to ensure relevance to instructional goals. Overall, teacher professional development programs should cater to a variety of teacher needs and curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/basics-of-qualitative-research/book235578

Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dabney, K., Tai, R., Almarode, J., Miller-Friedmann, J., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-School time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.629455

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Dhakal, S. P., Connell, J., & Burgess, J. (2018). Inclusion and work: Addressing the global challenges for youth employment. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 37(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-12-2017-0290

Fernandes, S., Araújo, A. M., Miguel, I., & Abelha, M. (2023). Teacher professional development in higher education: The impact of pedagogical training perceived by teachers. Education Sciences, 13(3), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030309

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hubert, C. (2021). Interdisciplinary learning and the effects on students. Master’s Theses & Capstone Projects. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/284

Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021105309984

Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140, 104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464

McKim, A. J., Pauley, C. M., Velez, J. J., & Sorensen, T. J. (2018). Interdisciplinary learning opportunities in agriculture, food, natural resources, and science: The role of the teacher. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02179

Meyer, A., Kleinknecht, M., & Richter, D. (2023). What makes online professional development effective? The effect of quality characteristics on teachers’ satisfaction and changes in their professional practices. Computers & Education, 200, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104805

Nankervis, A., Prikshat, V., & Cameron, R. (2017). Graduate work-readiness in Asia pacific economies: A review of the literature. In Transitions from Education to Work (pp. 16–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315533971-2

National Association of Agricultural Educators (NAAE). (2024). #TeachAg: Overview. NAAE. https://www.naae.org/teach-ag/why-teach-ag/overview/

Pauley, C. M., McKim, A. J., Jr, K. W. C., McKendree, R. B., & Sorenson, T. J. (2019). Evaluating interdisciplinary teaching: Curriculum for agricultural science education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.01157

Schipper, T. M., van der Lans, R. M., de Vries, S., Goei, S. L., & van Veen, K. (2020). Becoming a more adaptive teacher through collaborating in Lesson Study? Examining the influence of Lesson Study on teachers’ adaptive teaching practices in mainstream secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102961

Wang, H.-H., Charoenmuang, M., Knobloch, N. A., & Tormoehlen, R. L. (2020). Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0201-4

Watkins, D. C., & Gioia, D. (2015). Mixed methods research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199747450.001.0001

Zhang, Y., Zhou, S., Wu, X., & Cheung, A. C. K. (2024). The effect of teacher training programs on pre-service and in-service teachers’ global competence: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 45, 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100627

Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., & Padrón, Y. (2023). The effect of professional development on in-service STEM teachers’ self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x

Zippia. (2021, January 29). Science teacher demographics and statistics [2024]: Number of science teachers in the US. Zippia: The Career Expert. https://www.zippia.com/science-teacher-jobs/demographics/