Product labeling and consumer perceptions of foods containing bioengineered ingredients: Exploratory research combining eye-tracking and survey data

Blake Colclasure; Josh Spomer; Taylor K. Ruth

doi:10.37433/aad.v7i1.681

Authors

Blake Colclasure University of Tennessee-Knoxville, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8375-286X
Josh Spomer Doane University, Nebraska, USA
Taylor K. Ruth University of Tennessee-Knoxville, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v7i1.681

Keywords:

cue utilization theory, genetically modified food, Theory of Planned Behavior, SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, National Bioengineered Food Disclosure

Abstract

The National Bioengineered (BE) Food Disclosure Standard went into effect in the United States (U.S) in January 2022, requiring food manufacturers to disclose whether food offered for retail sale contains BE foods. Among several options, disclosures on food packaging can include text disclosure or an approved BE logo. We used eye-tracking instrumentation and digital images of food packages to compare college undergraduates’ (n = 67) visual attention of a BE text statement with a BE logo. We also used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and trust in science in the development of a survey to explore students’ perceptions toward and intention to purchase and consume BE foods. Findings indicated the over half of participants did not fixate on either the BE logo or text. For those who did, slightly more attention was given to the text. Overall, participants held favorable views toward BE but were neither likely nor unlikely in their intent to purchase BE foods. The TPB variables were significant in a model that can be used to explain nearly 65% of the variance in future intention to purchase and consume BE foods. No significant associations were found between logo or text attention allocation and survey variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agricultural Marketing Service. (n.d.). BE disclosure. USDA. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. (2016). Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-18003

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Ari, E., Yilmaz, V., & Olgun, M. (2021). The effect of trust benefit and risk perception of GM foods on behavior intention: A study on university students. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 64, 297–312. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-930755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-930755

Bar-Gill, O., Schkade, D., & Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Drawing false inferences from mandated disclosures. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2017.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2017.12

Bonny, S. (2015). Genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops, weeds, and herbicides: Overview and impact. Environmental Management, 57(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0589-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0589-7

Buiatti, M., Christou, P., & Pastore, G. (2012). The application of GMOs in agriculture and in food production for a better nutrition: Two different scientific points of view. Genes & Nutrition, 8(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-012-0316-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-012-0316-4

Caputo, V., Kilders, V., & Lusk, J. L. (2025). The effect of the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (NBFDS) on consumer preferences and acceptance of bioengineered and gene-edited food. Food Policy, 130, 102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102770

Chowdhury, A., Kabir, K. H., Abdulai, A., & Alam, M. (2023). Systematic review of misinformation in social and online media for the development of an analytical framework for agri-food sector. Sustainability, 15(6), 4753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064753

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlabaum.

Delwaide, A. C., Nalley, L. L., Dixon, B. L., Danforth, D. M., Nayga, R. M., Van Loo, E. J., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Revisiting GMOs: Are there differences in European consumers’ acceptance and valuation for cisgenically vs. transgenically bred rice? PloS ONE, 10, e0126060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126060

Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047707

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Food and Drug Administration. (2022, July). GMOs and your health. https://www.fda.gov/media/135280/download

George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.

Grego, C. (2018). The gm food debate: An evaluation of the national bioengineered food disclosure standard and recommendations for the United States based on food justice. Seatle University Law Review, 41(3), 1003–1034. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol41/iss3/6/

Greussing, E., Kessler, S. H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2020). Learning from science news via interactive and animated data visualizations: An investigation combining eye tracking, online survey, and cued retrospective reporting. Science Communication, 42(6), 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020962100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020962100

Guo, Z., Mustafa, M., & Ning, Y. (2026). Color and shape matter: How visual design features of front-of-package warning labels influence attractiveness perception, healthfulness perception and purchase intention. Eating and Weight Disorders – Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 31, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-026-01812-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-026-01812-0

Hellier, E., Tucker, M., Newbold, L., Edworthy, J., Griffin, J., & Coulson, N. (2012). The effects of labeling design characteristics on perceptions of genetically modified food. Journal of Risk Research, 15(5), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.646288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.646288

Hielscher, S., Pies, I., Valentinov, V., & Chatalova, L. (2016). Rationalizing the GMO debate: The ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050476

Hill, N., Elliot, M., & Meyers, C. (2021). Navigating transparent pork production: Analyzing visual attention of the Maschhoffs website. Journal of Applied Communications, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2352

Holt, J. A. (2014). The effect of media channels on consumers’ intentions to buy local food: An exploration of the theory of planned behavior and media channel perceptions (Publication No. 3716876). [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Florida]. University of Florida ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavior research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Kolodinsky, J., & Lusk, J. L. (2018). Mandatory labels can improve attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Science Advancments, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1413

Leggette, H. R., Rice, A. H., Carraway, C., Baker, M. A., & Conner, N. (2018). Applying eye-tracking research in education and communication to agricultural education and communication: A review of literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 79–108. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02079

Lorenz, B. A., Hartmann, M., & Simmons, J. (2015). Impacts from region-of-origin labeling on consumer product perception and purchasing intention—causal relationships in a TPB based model. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.002

Marques, M. D., Critchley, C. R., & Walshe, J. (2015). Attitudes to genetically modified food over time. How trust in organizations and th emedia cycle predict support. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514542372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514542372

Miles, J. (2005). Tolerance and variance inflation factor. In B. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics and behavioral science. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa683

National Science Board. (2018). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. NSF. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/

Oaya, C. Z. T., Newman, O., & Ezie, O. (2017). Impact of packaging on consumer buying behavior in Nasarawa State. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 36(4), 28–46. https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/8083

Rainbolt, G. N., Onozaka, Y., & McFadden, D. T. (2012). Consumer motivations and buying behavior: The case of the local food system movement. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 18(5), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.685031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.685031

Rogers-Randolph, T., Lundy, L. K., Telg, R. W., Rumble, J. N., Myers, B., & Lindsey, A. B. (2021). To post or not to post? Factors influencing state FFA officers’ social media behaviors. Journal of Applied Communications, 105(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2362

Rumble, J. N., Wu, Y.-L., Tully, K., Ruth, T. K., Ellis, J. D., & Lamm, A. J. (2020). A mixed-methods comparison of self-reported and conversational trust in science. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(4), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2371

Ruth, T., Rumble, J., Gay, K., & Rodriguez, M. (2016). The importance of source: A mixed methods analysis of undergraduate students’ attitudes toward genetically modified food. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(3), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03145

Ruth, T. K., & Rumble, J. N. (2017). What’s in a name? the influence of persuasive communication on Florida consumers’ attitude toward genetically modified food. Journal of Applied Communications, 101(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1006

Ruth, T. K., Rumble, J. N., Lamm, A. J., Irani, T., & Ellis, J. D. (2019). Are American’s attitudes toward GM science really negative? An academic examination of attitudes and willingness to expose attitudes. Science Communication, 41(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018819935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018819935

Ryan, C. D., Henggeler, E., Gilbert, S., Schaul, A. J., & Swarthout, J. T. (2024). Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: Strategies, products, and politics. GM Crops & Foods, 15(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2318027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2318027

Scanlon, M. A. (2019). Trust in science and attitudes regarding genetically modified organisms in U.S. adults. [Doctoral dissertation, Barry University, Barry University], ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Stanton, C., & Fischer, L. (2020). Let’s focus in: A guide to eye tracking technology in agricultural communications research. Journal of Applied Communications, 104(2), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2320

Tims, K. (2021). Scientific knowledge shaping perceptions of bioengineered food among undergraduate students. [Master’s thesis, The University of Maine], DigitalCommons@UMaine.

United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). List of bioengineered foods. Agricultural Marketing Service. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be/bioengineered-foods-list

Woodside, J. (2024). Misinformation in U.S. food and agriculture: A policy analysis of impacts and recommended solutions. Journal of Food Law and Policy, 20(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.54119/jflp.veyx2185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54119/jflp.veyx2185

Woźniak-Gientka, E., Agata, T., Milica, P., Anna, B., Dennis, E., Nick, V., Godelieve, G., Selim, C., Nagmeh, A., & Tomasz, T. (2022). Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security. GM Crops & Food, 13(1), 218–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946

Zafar, M. Z., Shi, X., Yang, H., Abbas, J., & Chen, J. (2022). The impact of interpretive packaged food labels on consumer purchase intention: The comparative analysis of efficacy and inefficiency of food labels. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15098. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215098

Zhang, J., Wu, Z., Hu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Hu, J. (2026). Ugly outside, healthy inside: How packaging information labels shape consumer perceptions of imperfect fruits. Food Quality and Preference, 138, Article 105832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105832