Student perceptions after touching vs. holding educational animals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i2.129Keywords:
animal ambassadors, environmental education, experiential learning, reptiles as teaching toolsAbstract
Educators often use reptiles as ambassadors of environmental messages during presentations because of their ease of transport and handling. Although learners may be provided opportunities to touch or hold these animals, this presents a variety of safety and liability issues for the learner and animal. Little is known about whether touching or holding an animal influences perceptions of the animal and related environmental issues. This qualitative study investigated the perceptions of 16 fifth grade students who experienced a live, tactile encounter with a corn snake and Eastern box turtle while participating in an educational class using four focus groups. Regardless of whether students touched the snake or turtle, or fully held the animal, participants noted the uniqueness of the experience and their empathy for the animal and its habitat. Students who fully held the animal thought that they learned more during the experience while students who touched the animal mentioned getting to know the animal better, regardless of whether the animal was a snake or turtle. When learners are unable to completely hold a snake or turtle, educators should consider the equally positive outcomes that can result from touching these animals with two fingers and provide opportunities for such experiences.
Downloads
References
Balis, L. E., Marshall, C., Malcolm, A., & Harden, S. M. (2019). Goat yoga: Preliminary implications for health, agriculture, and 4-H. Journal of Extension, 57(3). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2019june/pdf/JOE_v57_3iw4.pdf
Ballouard, J-M., Brischoux, F., & Bonnet, X. (2011). Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity. PLOS ONE, 6(8), Article e23152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023152
Ballouard, J., Provost, G., Barre, D., & Bonnet, X. (2012). Influence of a field trip on the attitude of school children toward unpopular organisms: An experience with snakes. Journal of Herpetology, 46(3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1670/11-118
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bixler, R. D., Carlisle, C. L., Hammitt, W. E., & Floyd, M. F. (1994). Observed fears and discomforts among urban students on field trips to wildland areas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(1), 24¬–33. https://doi/org/10.10180/00958964.1994.9941430
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Standards of validation and evaluation. In L. Habib, B. Bauhaus, & M. Masson (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (pp. 243–268). Sage Publications, Inc.
Daly, B., & Suggs, S. (2010). Teachers' experiences with humane education and animals in the elementary classroom: Implications for empathy development. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240903528733
Fuhrman, N. E. (2007). Predicting commitment to engage in environmentally responsible behaviors using injured and non-injured animals as teaching tools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/02/12/89/00001/fuhrman_n.pdf
Fuhrman, N., & Ladewig, H. (2008). Characteristics of animals used in zoo interpretation: A synthesis of research. Journal of Interpretation Research, 13(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258720801300203
Fuhrman, N. E., & Rubenstein, E. D. (2017). Teaching with animals: The role of animal ambassadors in improving presenter communication skills. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.01223
Gibson, J. E. (2014). Interviews and focus groups with children: Methods that match children’s developing competencies. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4(2), 148–159. https://doi/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00119.x
Hudson, S. J. (2001). Challenges for environmental education: Issues and ideas for the 21st century. BioScience, 51(4), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0283:CFEEIA]2.0.CO;2
Hummel, E., & Randler, C. (2012). Living animals in the classroom: A meta-analysis on learning outcome and a treatment-control study focusing on knowledge and motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9285-4
Kidd, A. H., & Kidd, R. M. (1995). Developmental factors in positive attitudes toward zoo animals. Psychological Reports, 76(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.71
Klingenberg, K. (2014). ‘Primärerfahrung’ with living animals in contrast to educational videos: A comparative intervention study. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.849285
Kreger, M., & Mench, J. (1995). Visitor-animal interactions at the zoo. Anthrozoos, 8(3), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279395787156301
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalist Inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books.
Mallon, G. (1992). Utilization of animals as therapeutic adjuncts with children and youth: A review of the literature. Child and Youth Care Forum, 21(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757348
Meadan, H., & Jegatheesan, B. (2010). Classroom pets and young children: Supporting early development. Young Children, 65(3) 70–77. https://www.proquest.com/docview/873822959?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Newberry, M. G., Fuhrman, N. E., & Morgan, A. C. (2017). Naming “animal ambassadors” in an educational presentation: Effects on learner knowledge retention. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 16(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1333051
Pedersen, H. (2010). Animals in schools: Processes and strategies in human-animal education. Purdue University Press.
Rud, A. G., & Beck, A. M. (2003). Companion animals in Indiana elementary schools. Anthrozoos, 16(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279303786992134
Shalev, A., & Ben-Mordehai, D. (1996). Snakes: Interactions with children with disabilities and the elderly - some psychological considerations. Anthrozoos, 9(4), 182. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279396787001446
Sherwood, K. P, Rallis, S. F., & Stone, J. (1989). Effects of live animals vs. preserved specimens on student learning. Zoo Biology, 8(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430080112
Shiloh, S., Sorek, G., & Terkel, J. (2003). Reduction of state-anxiety by petting animals in a controlled laboratory experiment. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 16(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061580031000091582
Siegel, W. (2004). The role of animals in education. ReVision, 27(2), 17–26. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA127936654&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=02756935&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=highlands_edu
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Stanford, A. (2014). Can I touch it?: Zoo program impacts. IZE Journal, 50, 64–67. https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/resources/pac/media/files/pac/projects/2016/11/the-sydney-zoo/supplementary-assessment-and-information/annexure-11--academic-research-on-animal-interaction.pdf
Strife, S., & Downey, L. (2009). Childhood development and access to nature: A new direction for environmental inequality research. Organization and Environment, 22(1), 99¬122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026609333340
Trainin, G., Wilson, K., Wickless, M., & Brooks, D. (2005). Extraordinary animals and expository writing: Zoo in the classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7195-z
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). Sustainable development goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
Von Bergen, C. W. (2015). Emotional support animals, service animals, and pets on campus. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 5(1), 15¬–34. https://doi.org/10.5929/2015.5.1.3
