A quantitative approach to identifying turfgrass key players

Keywords: Diffusion of Innovations, turfgrass, KeyPlayer, network identification

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically identify “key players” and media channels within the turf industry to constitute the diffusion of innovations in emerging turf research and technologies. Online survey questions were structured using Borgatti’s KeyPlayer™ (TM Analytic Technologies) software to determine “the contribution of a set of actors to the cohesion of the network (Borgatti, 2006, p. 21). Turf industry professionals were asked to identify who they trust when they have questions regarding turfgrass. Researchers directly contacted 282 participants via email, collecting 239 responses. The top 25 key players, the number of distinct persons reached in the network, and the percent of the network reached were calculated for the entire sample and each strata of the sample (including golf course superintendents, landscapers, turf producers, Extension, and Others—including Extension Specialists, Turfgrass Faculty, and Sales representatives. Of the 422 unique names mentioned in the survey, key player data showed that the top 25 key players were 1 or 2 steps away from 305 distinct persons in the network (72.3% of the network). With their influence on the larger network, these individuals will now be enlisted to aid in the diffusion of emerging new turf research and technologies.

References

Abdel-Ghany, M. (2012). Identifying opinion leaders using social network analysis, a study in an Egyptian village. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 4(4) 12–19. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2012-04.02

Borgatti, S. (2008, June 23). The Key Player Problem. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1149843

Borgatti, S. P. (1999, January 1). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10588-006-7084-x

Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271629956600104

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. (4th ed.). Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Flynn, R. L., Goldsmith, R. E., & Eastman, J. K. (1996, March). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1177/0092070396242004

Gile, K. J., & Handcock, M. S. (2010). Respondent-driven sampling: An assessment of current methodology. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 285-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679531.2010.01223.x

Kirchherr, J., & Charles, K. (2018). Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: Recommendations from a research project on antidam movements in Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE, 13(8) Article e0201710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201710

Lamm, K. W., Borron, A., & Holt, J. (2019). Communication channel preferences: A descriptive audience segmentation evaluation. Journal of Applied Communications, 103(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2238

Lenhardt, M., Ricketts, J.C., Morgan, A. C., & Karnock, K. J. (2011, December). Leadership behaviors of Georgia golf course superintendents: Implications for post-secondary programs. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture, 55(4), 23–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/nactajournal.55.4.23

Logan, R. A. (2001,). Science mass communication: Its conceptual history. Sage Journals, 23(2), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023002004

Masambuka-Kanchewa, F., Rodriguez, M., Buck, E., Niewoehner-Green, J., & Lamm, A.(2020). Impact of agricultural communication interventions on improving agricultural productivity in Malawi. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 27(3), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2020.273116

Millington, B., & Wilson, B. (2013). Super intentions: Golf course management and the evolution of environmental responsibility. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(3), 450–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12033

Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2016, April 6). Analysis and visualization of large networks with program package pajek. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40294-016-0017-8

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. (5th ed.). Free Press.

Ruth, T., Rumble, J., Lamm, A., & Ellis, J. (2018). A model for understanding decision-making related to agriculture and natural resource science and technology. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(4), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.04224

Schiele, A. (2020). Pseudoscience as media effect. Journal of Science Communication. 19(2). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19020101

Schwartz, B., Peake, J., Fuhrman, N., & Worley, B. (2020, Nov. 7). Using key player and decision-making models to increase diffusion of innovations in turf. [Conference session]. Crop Science Society of America. Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Published
2021-03-26
How to Cite
Worley, B., Fuhrman, N., & Peake, J. (2021). A quantitative approach to identifying turfgrass key players. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i1.85
Section
Articles