An evaluation of social networks within federally funded research projects
United States federal agencies fund research to promote discovery and innovation. Most agencies require collaboration because teams promote productivity to a greater degree than singular researchers. However, the functionality and productivity of collaboration is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the collaborative structure of a federally funded entomology research team to determine the characteristics of the network structure and its impact on research collaboration using social network analysis (SNA) methodology. An online survey and interviews were used to collect data. The theories of social network, strong and weak ties, and scientific collaboration were employed to determine the degree of collaboration among team members. We found a low density pattern of collaboration that was associated with: (a) a centralized pattern, (b) the presence of sub-teams functioning like sub-networks, and (c) the presence of less interactive members. Our results confirm that the SNA approach was useful for evaluating network collaboration with innovative indicators to assess the dynamics of scientific collaboration. The study was limited by non-response. Future research should focus on collecting SNA data longitudinally of the whole network to determine how networking structure and benefits evolves over time, and how strong and weak ties impact scientific discovery.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis [Computer software]. Analytic Technologies. http://www.analytictech.com/archive/ucinet.htm
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
Contandriopoulos, D., Larouche, C., & Duhoux, A. (2018). Evaluating academic research networks. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 33(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.42159
Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Wiley & Sons.
Ding, Y., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. (1998). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval. International Information & Library Review, 30(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.1998.10762484
Dunn, W. N. (1983). Social network theory. Knowledge, 4(3), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708300400306
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Friese, S. (2019). ATLAS.ti 8 Mac user manual. https://downloads.atlasti.com/docs/manual/manual_a8_mac_en.pdf?_ga=2.31688247.844522840.1558027933-883190210.1548880313
Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Hansen, T. (2009). Applying social network theory and analysis in the struggle for social justice. Peace Research, 41(1), 5-43. www.jstor.org/stable/23607964
Hoang, D. T., Nguyen, N. T., Tran, V. C., & Hwang, D. (2019). Research collaboration model in academic social networks. Enterprise Information Systems, 13(7-8), 1023-1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2018.1556812
Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02018100
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1
Lang, S. (2020). Otter [Computer software]. http://otter.ai
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Leij, M. V. D., & Goyal, S. (2011). Strong Ties in a Small World. Review of Network Economics, 10(2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1278
Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019, March 16). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332957319_Coding_qualitative_data_a_synthesis_guiding_the_novice
Mertens, (2018). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506330631
Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: a comprehensive guide. Guilford Press.
Olson, J. S., Hofer, E. C., Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, G. M., Cooney, D., & Faniel, I. (2008). A theory of remote scientific collaboration. Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, 73–97. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.187.8012&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human–computer interaction, 15(2-3), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Rademacher, M. A., & Wang, K. Y. (2014). Strong-tie social connections versus weak-tie social connections. Scholarship and Professional Work -Communication. 103, 1213-1216. http://digitalcommons.butler.edu/ccom_papers/103
Schmidt, A. (2007). Social network theory. Encyclopedia of Governance, 893–895. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952613.n503
U. S. Department of Agriculture. (2019). National Institute of Food and Agriculture FY 2018 Annual Report. https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/resource/NIFA-2018-Annual-Report.pdf
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. In: B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, (pp. 643-681). https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
Zamzami, N., & Schiffauerova, A. (2017). The impact of individual collaborative activities on knowledge creation and transmission. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1385–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2350-x
Copyright (c) 2020 Bidossessi Dossou Kpanou, Kathleen Kelsey, Kyle Bower
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.