Evaluating the impact of video-based agricultural extension on women’s empowerment in northern Uganda: A mixed-methods study

Meikah Dado; Jack Elliot; Rafael Landaverde; Kim Dooley; Gerald David Flint; Joseph Apea; Olivia Murphy-Sweet

doi:10.37433/aad.v7i4.746

Authors

Meikah Dado University of Missouri, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-929X
Jack Elliot Texas A&M University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-585X
Rafael Landaverde Texas A&M University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6489-0477
Kim Dooley Texas A&M University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-5988
Gerald David Flint Texas A&M University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6408-2258
Joseph Apea Field of Hope, Lira, Uganda https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7654-7245
Olivia Murphy-Sweet Field of Home, Johnston, Iowa, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4041-1348

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v7i4.746

Keywords:

evaluation, non-governmental organization, information communication technology, SDG 5: Gender Equality

Abstract

In Uganda, the agricultural industry is essential to the economy and livelihood of many individuals. However, women farmers in Uganda face barriers to profitable agricultural production including access to quality inputs, appropriate infrastructure, land ownership, markets, extension services, and anti-women biases in the public and private sector. While agricultural extension has been present in Uganda since the late 1800s, it lacks effectiveness and has gender disparities, requiring innovative approaches. Information communication technologies have shown promise to supporting agricultural extension services. This study evaluates a program designed for women small-holder farmers in Uganda to receive agricultural extension services via video-based agricultural extension. Through a convergent mixed-methods approach, it examines how information communication technologies, specifically smartphones and video-based extension services, can support women empowerment in Northern Uganda. Key findings suggest video-based agricultural extension increased self-efficacy within the sample. Additionally, participants felt empowered and respected because of their increase in agricultural knowledge and access to technology. Recommendations for future programs include training and check-in components, incorporate a variety of video topics, increase the amount of time participants have access to video-based extension, and explore community-based approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, M., van Wessel, M., van Bommel, S., Ampaire, E. L., Jassogne, L., & Feindt, P. H. (2019). The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda’s climate change policy. Development Policy Review, 38(5), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12458

Anderson, S. (2022). Unbundling female empowerment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 55(4), 1671–1701. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12628

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Benin, S., Nkonya, E., Okecho, G., Randriamamonjy, J., Kato, E., Lubade, G., & Kyotalimye, M. (2010). Returns to spending on agricultural extension: The case of the national agricultural advisory services (NAADS) program of Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 42(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00512.x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen N. E., & Hyun H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Jost, C., Kyazze, F., Naab, J., Neelormi, S., Kinyangi, J., Zougmore, R., Aggarwai, P., Bhatta, G., Chaudhury, M., Tapio-Bistrom, M., Nelson, S., & Kristjanson, P. (2015). Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities. Climate and Development, 8(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1050978

Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273

Kovaleva, M., Filho, W. L., Borgemeister, C., & Kalungu, J. W. (2022). Understanding needs and potentials for gender-balanced empowerment and leadership in climate change adaption and mitigation in Africa. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159410

Lecoutere, E., Spielman, D. J., & Van Campenhout, B. (2019, September 23–26). Empowering women with digital extension in Uganda: Effects of information and role models [Paper presentation]. 6th African Conference of Agricultural Economists, Abuja, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.295694

Ledermann, S. T., Anderson, J. R., & Pray, C. E. (2024). Observations on status and trends of agricultural extension and inequality in Uganda. World Development Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2024.100147

Leon-Himmelstine, C., Phiona, S., Löwe, A., Plank, G., & Vu, N. (2021). Young women in the agricultural sector in Uganda: Lessons from the Youth Forward Initiative. ODI. https://odi.org/en/publications/young-women-in-the-agricultural-sector-in-uganda-lessons-from-the-youth-forward-initiative/

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Malapit, H., Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Seymour, G., Martinez, E. M., Heckert, J., Rubin, D., Vaz, A., & Yount, K. M. (2019). Development of the project-level women’s empowerment in agriculture index (pro-WEAI). World Development, 122, 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.018

Marimo, P., Otieno, G., Njuguna-Mungai, E., Vernooy, R., Halewood, M., Fadda, C., Mulumba, J. W., Nyamongo, D. O., & Mollel, M. (2021). The role of gender and institutional dynamics in adapting seed systems to climate change: Case studies from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Agriculture, 11(9), 840. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090840

Mpiima, D. M., Manyire, H., Kabonesa, C., & Espiling, M. (2019). Gender analysis of agricultural extension policies in Uganda: Informing practice. Gender, Technology and Development, 23(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1657610

Muhanguzi, F. K., Boonabaana, B., Sanya, L. N., Kavuma, S. N., Kyomuhendo, G. B., Ludgate, N., & Meinzen-Dick, L. (2023). The meanings of resilience in climate justice: Women smallholder farmers’ responses to agricultural shocks in Uganda under the spotlight. Agenda, 37(3), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2023.2245844

Okello, D. M., Akita, I., Atube, F., Kalulue, S. W., & Ongeng, D. (2022). Examining the relationship between farmers’ characteristics and access to agricultural extension: Empirical evidence from northern Uganda. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2082500

Palocios-Lopez, A., Christiaensen, L., & Killic, T. (2017). How much of the labour in African agriculture is provided by women? Food Policy, 67, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.017

Pan, Y., Smith, S. C., & Sulaiman, M. (2018). Agricultural extension and technology adoption for food security: Evidence from Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(4), 1012–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay012

Quisumbing, A., Cole, S., Elias, M., Faas, S., Galiè, A., Malapit, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Myers, E., Seymour, G., & Twyman, J. (2023). Measuring women’s empowerment in agriculture: Innovations and evidence. Global Food Security, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100707

Seymour, G., Ferguson, N., van Biljon, C., & Malapit, H. (2023). User guide on the project-level women’s empowerment in agriculture index (pro-WEAI). International Food Policy and Research Institute. https://weai.ifpri.info/files/2023/07/Pro-WEAI-Guide-2.pdf

Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed method research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861

Subramanian, K., Bozzola, M., & Nugent, A. (2022, April 4–6). The role of ICT adoption in promoting livelihoods in Eastern Africa: Evidence from Uganda [Conference presentation]. 96th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Leuven, Belgium. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.320739

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Turyasingura, B., & Chavula, P. (2022). Climate-smart agricultural extension service innovation approaches in Uganda: Review paper. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 6(1), 35–43. https://doi.org//10.26855/ijfsa.2022.03.006