Examining student involvement in the total program in small schools in New Mexico

R. G. Easterly III; Frank Hodnett; Mary T Rodriguez

doi:10.37433/aad.v3i1.177

Authors

R. G. (Tre) Easterly III University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2807-512X
Frank Hodnett New Mexico State University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-4342
Mary T. Rodriguez The Ohio State University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i1.177

Keywords:

Rural, school-based agricultural education, United States, Case study

Abstract

The dynamics facing rural development and school policy in New Mexico has limited merging and redistricting efforts in small schools in isolated rural communities. This has created a situation where small schools exist in several rural communities in the state. These programs often include school-based agricultural education as a program offering. The dynamics of the schools can impact how the total program approach commonly used in agricultural education can be implemented. The purpose of the study was to explore how agriculture teachers in small schools in New Mexico developed their own institutional polices and worked with the policies established by the school to involve students in the total program. A qualitative case study with six teachers was conducted. The themes emphasized the nuanced nature of the programs as well as the importance of relationships with students, parents, community members, and school staff to implement these programs. The teachers faced challenges related to balancing student time and working with athletics for scheduling. Successful programs cater to the context of the school and community by getting to know the students they serve. Advice and best practices provided by the teachers were discussed. Recommendations were provided related to establishing and maintaining relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5). https://www.middlesex.mass.edu/ace/downloads/astininv.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bradley, S., & Taylor, J. (2001). The effect of school size on exam performance in secondary schools. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60(3), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00102

Bronk, K.C. (2012). The exemplar methodology: An approach to studying the leading edge of development. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-2-5

Coladarci, T., & Cobb, C. D. (1996). Extracurricular participation, school size, and achievement and self-esteem among high school students: A national look. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(2), 92–103 https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/12-2_8.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Croom, D. B. (2008). The development of the integrated three-component model of agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.01110

Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1259–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00275.x

DiBenedetto, C. A., Willis, V. C., & Barrick, R. K. (2018). Needs assessment for school-based agricultural education teachers: A review of literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(4), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.04052

Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2007). Profiles and portfolios of adolescent school-based extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Adolescence, 30(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.004

Foreman-Peck, J. & Foreman-Peck, L. (2006). Should schools be smaller? The size-performance relationship for Welsh schools. Economics of Education Review, 25(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.004

Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop. National School Boards Association Center for Public Education. https://cdn-files.nsba.org/s3fs-public/10901-5071_CPE_Rural_School_Report_Web_FINAL.pdf

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 464–490. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326158

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

McNeal, R. B. (1999). Participation in high school extracurricular activities: Investigating school effects. Social Science Quarterly, 80(2), 291–309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42863901

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2020). Digest of education statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/current_tables.asp

National FFA Organization. (n.d.). Agricultural Education: About FFA. https://www.ffa.org/agricultural-education/

Newcomb, L. H., McCracken, J. D., Warmbrod, J. R., & Whittington, M. S. (2004). Methods of teaching agriculture (3rd ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Education, 73(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673198

Sawkins, J. W. (2002). Examination performance in Scottish secondary schools: An ordered logit approach. Applied Economics, 34(16), 2031–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210124559

Talbert, B. A., Vaughn, R., Croom, B., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Foundations of agricultural education (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.