Transactional factors influencing the implementation of intercollegiate Extension programs at U.S. land-grant universities

Olivia Caillouet; Amy Harder; T. Grady Roberts; J. C. Bunch; Heidi Radunovich

doi:10.37433/aad.v3i3.215

Authors

Olivia Caillouet University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5851-0682
Amy Harder University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7042-2028
T. Grady Roberts University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7618-7850
J. C. Bunch University of Florida, USA
Heidi Radunovich University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-1480

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i3.215

Keywords:

Collaboration, interdisciplinary, complex problems, organizational change model

Abstract

University engagement within communities is becoming more important, and public land-grant universities (LGUs) are uniquely situated to create knowledge that benefits society. Intercollegiate Extension programs could be a novel approach to improving university engagement by using the Extension mission as a catalyst for socially relevant programs. However, a gap remains in the literature regarding specific guidelines to overcome barriers toward intercollegiate Extension programs. The purpose of this study was to explore how transactional factors influenced the implementation of intercollegiate Extension programs at LGUs. A qualitative descriptive phenomenological research design was used. The Organizational Change model guided the interview protocol creation. All eight participants were employed by LGUs. Template analysis was applied to the data combined with the constant comparative method. Four themes and six sub-themes emerged from the interviews. The transactional themes were: (a) promotion and tenure, (b) utilizing LGUs’ organizational structures to support intercollegiate Extension programs, (c) task and individual skills required for successful intercollegiate programs, and (d) professional recognition. Utilizing LGUs’ organizational structures to support intercollegiate Extension programs was most relevant to the success of intercollegiate programs. Intercollegiate Extension programs should use existing assets like the county-based infrastructure to assist in disseminating university knowledge relevant for addressing public needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2015). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746

Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224

Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A casual model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800306

Buys, D., & Koukel, S. (2018). The national framework for health and wellness: (Re)framing the work of Cooperative Extension for the next century. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.54718/ECSB8657

Caillouet, O. C. (2022). A qualitative study of Cooperative Extension’s use of a systems approach leveraging land-grant universities to address complex issues [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. ProQuest.

Caillouet, O. C., & Harder, A. (2021). Diverse perspectives on trends impacting the future of Extension in Florida. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(3), 202–216. https://www.jae-online.org/attachments/article/2417/62.3.19_Final.pdf

Caillouet, O. C., Harder, A., Bunch, J. C., Roberts, T. G., & Radunovich, H. (2022). An exploration of the transformational factors affecting the performance of intercollegiate Extension programs. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture [NACTA], 66, 103–112. https://www.nactateachers.org/attachments/article/3228/43%20FINAL.pdf

Carnegie Classification of Institutions. (2018). Carnegie R1 and R2 research classifications doctoral universities. https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty/tenurepromotion/institutions-research-categories.pdf

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Condo, E. P., & Martin, K. E. (2002). Health professions and Cooperative Extension partnership. Journal of Extension, 40(4), Article 4FEA2. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2002august/a2.php

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design (4th ed.). SAGE.

Culp, K. (2009). The scholarship of Extension: Practical ways for Extension professionals to share impact. Journal of Extension, 47(6), Article v47-6comm1. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2009december/comm1.php

Engagement Scholarship Consortium [ESC]. (n.d.). Current member institutions. https://engagementscholarship.org/membership/current-member-institutions

Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 7–27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001357.pdf

Garrett, E. M., & Belle, A. J. (2022). Engaging hard-to-reach audiences through internal interdisciplinary and external diverse collaborations. Journal of Extension, 60(2), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.60.02.13

Harder, A., Lamm, A., & Strong, R. (2009). An analysis of the priority needs of Cooperative Extension at the county level. Journal of Agricultural Education, 50(3), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2009.03011

Holland, A., Troschinetz, A., & Missaghi, S. (2019). Get started or unstuck: Four elements of successful interdisciplinary collaboration in Extension. Journal of Extension, 57(5), Article v57-5comm1. https://archives.joe.org/joe/2019october/comm1.php

Kellogg Commission. (1998). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution, Kellogg Commission on the future of state and land-grant universities. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. https://www.aplu.org/library/returning-to-our-roots-the-engaged-institution/file

King, D. (2018). Hey, Siri, what is the future of Extension? Journal of Extension, 56(5), Article 18. https://joe.org/joe/2018september/comm1.php

Leahey, E., & Barringer, S. N. (2020). Universities’ commitment to interdisciplinary research: To what end? Research Policy, 49, 1¬–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103910

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lyons, T. S., Miller, S. R., & Mann, J. T. (2018). A new role for land-grant universities in the rural innovation ecosystem? Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 48(2), 32¬–47.

McDowell, G. R. (2001). Land-grant universities and Extension into the 21st century: Renegotiating of abandoning a social contract. Iowa State University Press. https://aaec.vt.edu/content/dam/aaec_vt_edu/people/adjunct-emeritus/faculty-books/G.McDowell-Renegotiating-or-Abandoning-a-Social-Contract.pdf

New England Higher Education. (n.d.). Understanding Community Engagement Carnegie Classification. https://nerche.org/carnegie-engagement-classification/

Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 11(3), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2017-0006

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/209203

Walsh, M., John, D., Peritore, N., Morris, A., Bird, C., Ceraso, M., Eichberger, S., Novotny, R., Stephenson, L., Stluka, S., & Riportella, R. (2018). Health in all policies: Working across sectors in Cooperative Extension to promote health for all. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.54718/RYTE6013

Warner, L. A., Vavrina, C. S., Campbell, M. L., Elliott, M. L., Northrop, R. J., & Place, N. T. (2017). A strategic plan for introducing, implementing, managing, and monitoring an urban Extension platform. Journal of Extension, 55(3), Article 22. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol55/iss3/22/