Improving forestry secondary education: Identifying teachers’ needs

Keywords: forestry education, professional development, Delphi method, classroom instruction


Industrial, technological, and societal changes require teachers to be continually engaged in professional learning activities that promote new scientific approaches to education and content. Providing teachers with current and relevant professional development is an important task in secondary education. This study sought to identify the professional development needs for educators who teach forestry and forest ecosystem content to secondary students. Researchers used the Delphi method with two participant groups to investigate the diversity of thought held throughout the southeastern United States. Participants were agriculture and environmental science teachers, state department of education administrators, foresters, and environmental scientists. Participants identified eleven areas of educational need: 1. Forestry career days, 2. Tree diseases and pathogens, 3. Graduation requirements limit student opportunities to take electives, 4. Career counseling in forestry jobs, 5. Educate students about degrees needed for forestry careers, 6. Over commitment of students to extra-curricular activities, 7. Lack of foundational forestry knowledge, 8. Lack of forestry /agriculture programs in schools, 9. Develop forestry electives in middle school, 10. Lack of foundational forest management knowledge, and 11. Connect classroom content to FFA and Envirothon extra-curricular activities. 


Barrick, R. K., Ladewig, H. W., & Hedges, L. E. (1983). Development of a systematic approach to identifying technical inservice needs of teachers. Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 24(1), 13–19.

Connaughton, K. (2015). Forestry employment trends. Journal of Forestry, 113(6), 571–573.

Copenheaver, C. A., Duncan, D. W., Leslie, L. D., & McGehee, N. G. (2004). An exploration of cross-disciplinary peer education in natural resources. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 33, 124–130.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st -century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57,1–15.

Fox, T.R., Jokela, E.J., & Allen, H.L. (2004). The evolution of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.

Franklin, E. A. (2011). Greenhouse facility management experts identification of competencies and teaching methods to support secondary agricultural education instructors: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4), 150–161.

Fuhrman, N.E., Morgan, A.C., Copenheaver, C.A., Peterson, J.A., Newberry, M.G., DeLoach, S.G., & van de Gevel, S. (2014). Repeated monitoring of forest plots: Evaluating the accuracy of student scientist data. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Journal, 58(2), 95–101.

Joerger, R.M. (2002). A comparison of the in-service education needs of two cohorts of beginning Minnesota agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3), 11–24.

Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2008). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 467–782.

Lockerman Friend, K.R. (2008). Attitudes and knowledge of forestry by high school agricultural education teachers in West Virginia (Publication No. 1458746) [Master’s thesis, West Virginia University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

McCabe, S.M., Munsell, J.F., & Seiler, J.R. (2014). Forest field trips among high school science teachers in the southern Piedmont. Natural Sciences Education, 43(1), 44–50.

Munsell, J.F., McCabe, S.M., & Seiler, J.R. (2016). Forestry education in US Southern Piedmont high school science classes. Journal of Forestry, 114(4), 441–448.

Myers, B. E., & Thompson, G. W. (2009). Integrated academics into agriculture programs: A Delphi study to determine perceptions of the National Agriscience Teacher Ambassador Academy participants. Journal of Agricultural Education, 50(2), 75–86.

Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42, 15–29.

Peake, J., Duncan, D., & Ricketts, J., (2007). Identifying Technical Content Training Needs of Georgia Agriculture Teachers. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 23(1), 44–55.

Roberts, T. G., & Dyer, J. E. (2004). Characteristics of effective agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4), 82–95.

Rouleau, M., Sharik, T.L., Whitens, S., & Wellstead, A. (2017). Enrollment decision-making in U.S. forestry and related natural resource degree programs. Natural Sciences Education, 46(1), 1–9.

Rubenstein, E. D. & Thoron, A. C. (2014). The creation of a biofuels and sustainable agriculture post-secondary curriculum: A true-Delphi study. Career and Technical Education Research, 39(2), 171–184.

Sharik, T.L., Lilieholm, R.J., Lindquist, W. & Richardson, W.W. (2015). Undergraduate enrollment in natural resource programs in the United States: Trends drivers, and implications for the future of natural resource professions. Journal of Forestry, 113(6), 538–551.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038.

Sussman, S., Burton, D., Dent, C.W., Stacy, A.W., & Flay B.R. (1991). Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco use cessation program: Collection of norm effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 21(21),1772–1782.

Thangaratinam, S., & Redman, C. WE. (2005). The Delphi technique. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, 7(2), 120–125.

The National Council for Agricultural Education. (2019, December 2). National AFNR content standards.

USDA Forest Service (2015). USDA Forest Service Strategic Plan: FY 2015–2020. FS-1045. USDA Forest Service.

Velardi, S. H., Folta, E., Rickard, L., & Kuehn, D. (2015). The components of effective professional development for science educators: A case study with environmental education program Project Learning Tree. Applied Environmental and Communication, 14(4), 223–231.

Washburn, S. G., King, B. O., Garton, B. L., & Harbstreit, S. R. (2001, February 22 - 24). The professional development needs of Kansas teachers of agriculture. Proceedings of the AAAE Central Region Agricultural Education Research Conference, 216–227. https:/

How to Cite
Rubenstein, E., Copenheaver, C. A., & Peake, J. B. (2020). Improving forestry secondary education: Identifying teachers’ needs. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 1(3), 81-94.