Can you cite that? Describing Tennessee consumers’ use of GMO information channels and sources

Julia Gibson; Jamie Greig; Shelli Rampold; Hannah Nelson; Christopher Stripling

doi:10.37433/aad.v3i2.181

Authors

Julia Gibson University of Tennesee, USA
Jamie Greig University of Tennesee, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7588-6374
Shelli Rampold University of Tennessee, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-7157
Hannah Nelson University of Tennessee, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0963-1450
Christopher Stripling University of Tennessee, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-3492

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i2.181

Keywords:

GMO perceptions, public opinion, survey, communication, genetically modified

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to better understand where and how Tennessee consumers receive information about genetically modified (GM) products by examining the use of informational channels and sources among consumers with negative-leaning, neutral, and positive-leaning perceptions of GM products. Twenty percent of respondents were categorized as having negative-leaning perceptions, roughly two-thirds held neutral perceptions, and only 10% of respondents had positive-leaning perceptions. The use of information channels was similar across all perception groups, with websites, word-of-mouth communication, television, and social media as the primary channels used. However, respondents with negative GM perceptions primarily used food bloggers, family, and friends as informational sources, while those with positive-leaning perceptions used food scientists, USDA professionals, and agricultural producers. The findings of this study offer implications for a variety of audiences and communication goals, whether such goals be to market to an existing consumer base or develop an educational campaign to address misconceptions among consumer groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, E. A., Lucht, T., Jensen, J. P., & Jordan-Conde, Z. (2001, January 09–10). Handling of GM crop issues by the mass media. 2001 Illinois Crop Protection Technology Conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States.

Abbott, E. A., & Lucht, T. (2001, August 5–8). Riding the hoopla: An analysis of mass media coverage of GMOs in Britain and the United States. Science Communication Interest Group, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington D.C., United States.

Aleksejeva, I. (2014). Latvian consumers’ knowledge about genetically modified organisms. Organizacijų Vadyba: Sisteminiai Tyrimai, 2014(72), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.7220/mosr.2335.8750.2014.71.1

Aqil, A., Lippeveld, T., & Hozumi, D. (2009). PRISM framework: A paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy and Planning 24(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp010

Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J., & Tourangeau, R. (2013). Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1(2), 90–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008

Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2). https://archives.joe.org/joe/2012april/pdf/JOE_v50_2tt2.pdf

Brondi, S., Pellegrini, G., Guráň, P., Fero, M., & Rubin, A. (2021). Dimensions of trust in different forms of science communication: The role of information sources and channels used to acquire science knowledge. Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030208

Chen, C., Li, J., Shuai, J., Nelson, H., Walzem, A., & Cheng, J. (2021). Linking social-psychological factors with policy expectation: Using local voices to understand solar PV poverty alleviation in Wuhan, China. Energy Policy, 151(2021), Article 112160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112160

Csótó, M. (2011). Information flow in agriculture – through new channels for improved effectiveness. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 1(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2010.1.2.17

Cui, K., & Shoemaker, S. P. (2018). Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A nationwide Chinese consumer study. National Portfolio Journal Science of Food, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-018-0018-4

European Society for Opinion and Market Research. (2019). 28 questions to help research buyers of online samples. https://amerispeak.norc.org/Documents/FeatureDocuments/NORC_AmeriSpeak_ESOMAR_28.pdf

Fischer, K., & Hess, S. (2021). The Swedish media debate on GMO between 1994 and 2018: What attention was given to farmers’ perspectives? Environmental Communication, 16(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1960406

Fresco, L.O. (2001, September 16–18). Genetically modified organisms in food and agriculture: Where are we? Where are we going?. Crop and Forest Biotechnology for the Future Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Falkenburg, Sweden. http://louiseofresco.com/pdf/FAO/2001_FAO-GMO_Where_are_we_Where_are_we_going_Sweden.pdf

Funk, C. (2020, March 18). About half of US adults are wary of health effects of genetically modified foods, but many also see advantages. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/03/18/about-half-of-u-s-adults-are-wary-of-health-effects-of-genetically-modified-foods-but-many-also-see-advantages/

Funk, C., & Kennedy, B. (2016, December 1). The new food fights: U.S. public divides over food science. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/11/PS_2016.12.01_Food-Science_FINAL.pdf

Funk, C., Tyson, A., Kennedy, B., & Johnson, C. (2020, September 29). Scientists are among the most trusted groups in society, though many value practical experience over expertise. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/scientists-are-among-the-most-trusted-groups-in-society-though-many-value-practical-experience-over-expertise/

Haynes, J. C., & Stripling, C. T. (2014). Mathematics efficacy and professional development needs of Wyoming agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(5), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.05048

Hefferon, M., & Anderson, M. (2016, December 7). Younger generations stand out in their beliefs about organic, GM foods. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/12/07/younger-generations-stand-out-in-their-beliefs-about-organic-gm-foods/

Jiang, K., Anderton, B. N., Ronald, P. C., & Barnett, G. A. (2018). Semantic network analysis reveals opposing online representations of the search term “GMO”. Global Challenges, 2(1), Article 1700082. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700082

Jiang, S., & Fang, W. (2019). Misinformation and disinformation in science: Examining the social diffusion of rumours about GMOs. Cultures of Science, 2(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/209660831900200407

Kahn, J. (2021). Learning to love G.M.O.s. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/20/magazine/gmos.html

Kim, H.K., Ahn, J., Atkinson, L., & Kahlor, L.A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and processing: A multicountry comparative study. Science Communication, 42(5), 586–615. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547020959670

Sharma, A.K., Jha, S. K., Kumar, V., Sachan, R. C., & Kumar, A. (2008). Critical analysis of information sources and channels preferred by rapeseed-mustard farmers. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 8(2 & 3), 42–45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265431241_Critical_Analysis_of_Information_Sources_and_Channels_Preferred_by_Rapeseed-Mustard_Farmers

Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2010). More than taking the heat: Crops and global change. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 13(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.008

MacVaugh, J., & Schiavone, F. (2010). Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011040258

O’Keefe, G. J., Boyd, H. H., & Brown, M. R. (1998). Who learns preventive health care information from where: Cross-channel and repertoire comparisons. Health Communication, 10(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1001_2

Oliver, M. J. (2014). Why we need GMO crops in agriculture. Missouri Medicine, 111(6), 492–507. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173531/

Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press.

Runge, K. K., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. A. (2018). Protective progressives to distrustful traditionalists: A post hoc segmentation method for science communication. Environmental Communication, 12(8), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854

Söderlund, C., & Lundin, J. (2017). What is an information source?: Information design based on information source selection behavior. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 4(3), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3071078.3071081

Stone, G., Singletary, M., & Richmond, V. P. (1999). Clarifying communication theories: A hands-on approach. Wiley-Blackwell.

Trivedi, M., Singh, R., Shukla, M., & Tiwari, R. K. (2016). GMO and food security. In Omkar (Ed.), Ecofriendly Pest Management for Food Security (1st ed., pp. 703–726). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803265-7.00023-3

Tucker, M., & Napier, T. L. (2002). Preferred sources and channels of soil and water conservation information among farmers in three midwestern US watersheds. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 92(2–3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00293-6

Turker, T., Koçak, N., Aydin, I., Istanbulluoğlu, H., Yildiran, N., Turk, Y. Z., & Kilic, S. (2013). Determination of knowledge, attitude, behavior about genetically modified organisms in nursing school students. Gulhane Medical Journal, 55(4), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.5455/gulhane.33326

Wilkins, E. J., Miller, H. M., Tilak, E., & Schuster, R. M. (2018). Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0209013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209013

Wolske, K. S., Gillingham, K. T., & Schultz, P. W. (2020). Peer influence on household energy behaviours. Nature Energy, 5, 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0541-9

Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances in Nutrition, 6(6), 842-851. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870

Xu, Z., & Lu, Y. (2019). Imagining GMOs: The Chinese public’s scientific perception in the digital age. Cultures of Science, 2(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/209660831900200402

Yang, Y. T., & Chen, B. (2016). Governing GMOs in the USA: Science, law and public health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96(6), 1851–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7523