Produce safety alliance grower training knowledge assessment results

Lendel Narine; Arlene Enderton; Matt Benge; Elizabeth Bihn; Stephanie Brown; Jovana Kovacevic; Elizabeth Newbold; Keith Schneider; Angela Shaw

doi:10.37433/aad.v5i3.473

Authors

Lendel Narine Utah State University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6962-2770
Arlene Enderton Iowa State University, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7416-6203
Matt Benge University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-3233
Elizabeth Bihn Cornell University, New York, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5806-3491
Stephanie Brown Oregon State University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-9984
Jovana Kovacevic Oregon State University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-4294
Elizabeth Newbold University of Vermont, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-4593
Keith Schneider University of Florida, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-3418
Angela Shaw Texas Tech University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5908-0429

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i3.473

Keywords:

evaluation, fruits, vegetables, knowledge, assessment, grower training, Food Safety Modernization Act, produce safety

Abstract

The Produce Safety Alliance (PSA) Grower Training (GT) curriculum was developed to provide produce growers with training that meets requirements in §112.22(c) of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule (PSR). Four regional food safety centers evaluated course attendees’ knowledge change over four years (2019 to 2022) using a pre- and post-test quiz. Knowledge assessment results showed (a) respondents gained knowledge on each of the seven modules presented in the curriculum; (b) the curriculum content had a large effect on knowledge gain; (c) knowledge gain differed significantly between years, but the differences were not of practical importance; (d) remote participants learned significantly more than in-person participants, but differences were not of practical importance; and (e) the quiz consisted of low and moderate difficulty questions (no questions were high difficulty) and had generally acceptable discriminant properties. Implementation of the FSMA PSR has progressed from an educational to a regulatory phase, and the authors recommend replacing the knowledge assessment with a tool that measures how the PSA course prepares growers for compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, M. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n293

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education (7th ed.). Thompson-Wadsworth.

Bennett, C. (1975). Up the hierarchy. Journal of Extension, 13(2), 7-12. https://archives.joe.org/joe/1975march/1975-2-a1.pdf

Bennett, C. (1976). Analyzing impacts of extension programs (ESC-575). United States Department of Agriculture, Science, and Education Administration. https://ia600708.us.archive.org/12/items/analyzingimpacts57benn/analyzingimpacts57benn.pdf

Bugingo, C., Stoeckel, D., Clements, D., George, L., Saunders, T., Blasini, D., Humiston, M., Melville, T., Way, R., Acuna-Maldonado, L., & Bihn, E. A. (2023). Remote PSA grower training delivery policy: Lessons learned and recommendations for future courses. Produce Safety Alliance. https://resources.producesafetyalliance.cornell.edu/documents/Remote-PSA-Grower-Training-Delivery-Policy-Lessons-Learned-and-Recommendations-for-Future-Courses.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Harder, A. (2019). Using the TOP model to measure program performance: A pocket reference (WC092). University of Florida Department of Agricultural Education and Communication UF/IFAS Extension. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/WC092

Millman, J., & Green, J. (1989). The specification and development of tests of achievement and ability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 335-366). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc; American Council on Education.

Rockwell, K., & Bennett, C. (2004). Targeting outcomes of programs: A hierarchy for targeting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication Department: Faculty Publications, 48. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/48/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Faglecfacpub%2F48&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Stewart, D. W., & Kamins, M. A. (1993). Secondary research: Information sources and methods (2nd ed., Vol. 4). Sage Publications, Inc.

Zimmerman, J. N., & Kahl, D. (2018). Finding publicly available data for extension planning and programming: Developing community portraits. The Journal of Extension, 56(3), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.56.03.01