Who farmers trust and how they Learn about new technologies: A modified Delphi study of Tennessee producers

Daniel Morris; John Ricketts

doi:10.37433/aad.v7i4.711

Authors

Daniel Morris University of Tennessee at Martin, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0598-9790
John Ricketts Tennessee State Unviversity, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-5803

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v7i4.711

Keywords:

farmer learning methods, content delivery, Delphi, SDG 4: Quality Education

Abstract

Understanding which information sources farmers trust and which delivery methods they prefer is fundamental to designing effective Extension programming and accelerating technology adoption in agriculture. A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted in Tennessee with 22 farmer panelists (12 livestock and 10 row crop) and 2 Extension specialists who only participated in Round 1. Across three rounds (n = 24, n = 17, n = 12), farmers reached consensus that economic benefit is the most important factor driving adoption (80% in Round 3) and that lack of demonstrated return on investment is the greatest barrier (58%). Field days and local meetings emerged as the consensus-preferred delivery method (67%). Although other farmers were the most frequently top-ranked information sources (50% in Round 3), consensus on a single most trusted source was not reached. A comparison between subgroups showed that row crop and livestock farmers diverged on cost vs. ROI framing of barriers and the relative weight of industry representatives as information source, suggesting effective Extension programming may need to target specific commodities. Findings suggest that peer-led field days and on-farm demonstrations, such as test plots, should be part of Extension programming design as institutional sources position themselves as validators rather than primary sources of dissemination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Blair, H. T., Sewell, A. M., Corner-Thomas, R. A., Kemp, P., Wood, B. A., Gray, D. I., Morris, S. T., Greer, A. W., Logan, C. M., Ridler, A. L., Hickson, R. E., & Kenyon, P. R. (2013). Understanding how farmers learn. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 20, 1-5. https://www.aaabg.org/aaabghome/proceedings20.php

Chivers, C. A., Bliss, K., de Boon, A., Lishman, L., Schillings, J., Smith, R., & Rose, D. C. (2023). Videos and podcasts for delivering agricultural extension: Achieving credibility, relevance, legitimacy and accessibility. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1997771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1997771

Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002

Drumm, S., Bradley, C., & Moriarty, F. (2022). ‘More of an art than a science’? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi Technique. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(1), 2230-2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027

Franz, N., Piercy, F., Donaldson, J., Richard, R., & Westbrook, J. (2010). How farmers learn: Implications for agricultural educators. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 25(1), 4. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol25/iss1/4

Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014529773. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014529773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014529773

Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90

Knowles, M. S. (1980). From pedagogy to andragogy. Religious Education, 75(4), 202-211. https://colllearning.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The-Modern-Practice-of-Adult-Education.pdf

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method (Vol. 1975, pp. 3-12). Addison-Wesley.

Mulungu, K., Kassie, M., & Tschopp, M. (2025). The role of information and communication technologies-based extension in agriculture: Application, opportunities and challenges. Information Technology for Development, 31(4), 1117–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2025.2456232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2025.2456232

Nettle, R., Major, J., Turner, L., & Harris, J. (2022). Selecting methods of agricultural extension to support diverse adoption pathways: A review and case studies. Animal Production Science, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1071/an22329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22329

Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

Pannell, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(11), 1407-1424. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.

Rose, D. C., Keating, C., & Morris, C. (2018). Understanding how to influence farmers’ decision-making behaviour: A social science literature review. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/67271/1/FarmersDecisionMaking_2018_09_18.pdf

Rust, N. A., Stankovics, P., Jarvis, R. M., Morris-Trainor, Z., de Vries, J. R., Ingram, J., ... & Reed, M. S. (2022). Have farmers had enough of experts? Environmental Management, 69(1), 31-44. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-021-01546-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01546-y

Škrinjar, I., Vučić, K., & Puljak, L. (2026). Sample size and consensus methods used in Delphi studies are heterogeneous: Meta-research study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 112262. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41921829/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112262

Stampfl, R., Prodinger, M., & Prodinger, J. (2025). Innovative paths to education: The effect of digital media on agricultural training in Austria. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101654

Sutherland, L. A., & Marchand, F. (2021). On-farm demonstration: Enabling peer-to-peer learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(5), 573-590 https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1959716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1959716

Toillier, A., Mathé, S., Saley Moussa, A., & Faure, G. (2022). How to assess agricultural innovation systems in a transformation perspective: A Delphi consensus study. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1953548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1953548

Ugochukwu, A. I., & Phillips, P. W. B. (2018). Technology adoption by agricultural producers: A review of the literature. In N. Kalaitzandonakes, E. G. Carayannis, E. Grigoroudis, & S. Rozakis (Eds.), From Agriscience to Agribusiness (pp. 361–377). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_17

Von Der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013