Empowering the caregiver network of farmers with a disability: A case study of the North Carolina AgrAbility project

Keywords: accomodations, assistive technology, professional development, qualitative research, special needs

Abstract

A majority of farmers with a disability rely heavily on caregivers to ensure they can fulfill their daily roles and responsibilities. Family members, such as spouses, parents, siblings, and children, are the most common caregivers. However, little is known about the resources and support needed to ensure these individuals can successfully navigate this complex role. In response, the North Carolina AgrAbility Project has provided caregivers with education, resources, and support so that these individuals can better assist farmers with a disability to minimize the job-related obstacles they face. In the current study, we sought to examine how caregivers of farmers with a disability have been empowered through the North Carolina AgrAbility Project. When viewed through the lens of Zimmerman’s empowerment theory, four themes emerged (a) barriers to empowerment; (b) intrapersonal empowerment; (c) interactional empowerment; and (d) behavioral empowerment. Consequently, findings from this investigation documented that caregivers navigated key barriers to become empowered after receiving assistance from the North Carolina AgrAbility Project. Further, their experiences in AgrAbility changed how they approached supporting farmers with a disability. In response, we provide recommendations for better supporting and leveraging the caregiver network of farmers with a disability.

References

Alston, A. J., Roberts, R., & Warren English, C. (2019). Building a sustainable agricultural career pipeline: Effective recruitment and retention strategies used by colleges of agriculture in the United States. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 3(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1073

Alston, A. J., Roberts, R., & Warren English, C. (2020). Toward a holistic agricultural student recruitment model: A national analysis of the factors affecting students’ decision to pursue an agricultural related degree. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 4(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1071

Christen C. T., & Fetsch, R. J. (2008). Colorado AgrAbility: Enhancing the effectiveness of outreach efforts targeting farmers and ranchers with disabilities. Journal of Applied Communications, 92(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1216

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.

Fetsch, R. J., Leathers, C. L., & Morgan, G. A. (2020a). Why do some farmers and ranchers overcome limitations from accidents and illnesses and others do not? AgrAbility works for most. Medical Research Archives, 8(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v8i2.2047

Fetsch, R. J., Petrea, R. E., Jones, P. J., Field, W. E., & Aherin, R. A. (2020b). A 25-year overview of AgrAbility demographics. Journal of Agromedicine, 25(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2020.1837318

Fetsch, R. J., & Turk, P. (2018). A quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of USDA's AgrAbility project. Disability and Health Journal, 11(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.004

Hamm, K. E., Field, W. E., Jones, P. J., Wolfe, A., & Olson, E. (2012). Twenty years of AgrAbility: A retrospective forum. Journal of Agromedicine, 17(4), 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2012.713844

Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigor in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326

Jepsen, S. D., McGuire, K., & Poland, D. (2011). Primary caregiver for a farm family member. The Ohio State University Extension. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.225.2551&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

National AgrAbility Project. (2021). The vision of AgrAbility. Purdue University. http://www.agrability.org/

Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275

Roberts, R., Stair, K. S., & Granberry, T. (2020a). Images from the trenches: A visual narrative of the concerns of preservice agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02324

Roberts, R., Witte, B. M., Stair, K. S., Blackburn, J. J., & Smith, H. E. (2020). The dimensions of professional development needs for secondary agricultural education teachers across career stages: A multiple case study comparison. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.03128

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972

Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922695

Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983

Published
2021-04-27
How to Cite
Minus , K., Woods , J., Roberts, R., English, C., & Rodriguez , B. (2021). Empowering the caregiver network of farmers with a disability: A case study of the North Carolina AgrAbility project. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i1.99
Section
Articles