Empowering the caregiver network of farmers with a disability: A case study of the North Carolina AgrAbility project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v2i1.99Keywords:
accomodations, assistive technology, professional development, qualitative research, special needsAbstract
A majority of farmers with a disability rely heavily on caregivers to ensure they can fulfill their daily roles and responsibilities. Family members, such as spouses, parents, siblings, and children, are the most common caregivers. However, little is known about the resources and support needed to ensure these individuals can successfully navigate this complex role. In response, the North Carolina AgrAbility Project has provided caregivers with education, resources, and support so that these individuals can better assist farmers with a disability to minimize the job-related obstacles they face. In the current study, we sought to examine how caregivers of farmers with a disability have been empowered through the North Carolina AgrAbility Project. When viewed through the lens of Zimmerman’s empowerment theory, four themes emerged (a) barriers to empowerment; (b) intrapersonal empowerment; (c) interactional empowerment; and (d) behavioral empowerment. Consequently, findings from this investigation documented that caregivers navigated key barriers to become empowered after receiving assistance from the North Carolina AgrAbility Project. Further, their experiences in AgrAbility changed how they approached supporting farmers with a disability. In response, we provide recommendations for better supporting and leveraging the caregiver network of farmers with a disability.
Downloads
References
Alston, A. J., Roberts, R., & Warren English, C. (2019). Building a sustainable agricultural career pipeline: Effective recruitment and retention strategies used by colleges of agriculture in the United States. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 3(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1073
Alston, A. J., Roberts, R., & Warren English, C. (2020). Toward a holistic agricultural student recruitment model: A national analysis of the factors affecting students’ decision to pursue an agricultural related degree. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 4(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1071
Christen C. T., & Fetsch, R. J. (2008). Colorado AgrAbility: Enhancing the effectiveness of outreach efforts targeting farmers and ranchers with disabilities. Journal of Applied Communications, 92(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1216
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
Fetsch, R. J., Leathers, C. L., & Morgan, G. A. (2020a). Why do some farmers and ranchers overcome limitations from accidents and illnesses and others do not? AgrAbility works for most. Medical Research Archives, 8(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v8i2.2047
Fetsch, R. J., Petrea, R. E., Jones, P. J., Field, W. E., & Aherin, R. A. (2020b). A 25-year overview of AgrAbility demographics. Journal of Agromedicine, 25(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2020.1837318
Fetsch, R. J., & Turk, P. (2018). A quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of USDA's AgrAbility project. Disability and Health Journal, 11(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.004
Hamm, K. E., Field, W. E., Jones, P. J., Wolfe, A., & Olson, E. (2012). Twenty years of AgrAbility: A retrospective forum. Journal of Agromedicine, 17(4), 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2012.713844
Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigor in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326
Jepsen, S. D., McGuire, K., & Poland, D. (2011). Primary caregiver for a farm family member. The Ohio State University Extension. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.225.2551&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
National AgrAbility Project. (2021). The vision of AgrAbility. Purdue University. http://www.agrability.org/
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275
Roberts, R., Stair, K. S., & Granberry, T. (2020a). Images from the trenches: A visual narrative of the concerns of preservice agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.02324
Roberts, R., Witte, B. M., Stair, K. S., Blackburn, J. J., & Smith, H. E. (2020). The dimensions of professional development needs for secondary agricultural education teachers across career stages: A multiple case study comparison. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.03128
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922695
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
