Measuring the perceived usefulness of social media professional learning networks to elevate agricultural development

Nicole Ray; Robert Strong; Courtney Meyers

doi:10.37433/aad.v3i4.275

Authors

Nicole Ray Fresno State University, California, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-0879
Robert Strong Texas A&M University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5279-4808
Courtney Meyers Texas Tech University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-3613

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v3i4.275

Keywords:

Secondary agriculture instructors, evaluating digital learning, online engagement, innovation adoption

Abstract

Elevating agricultural development requires attention to aspects beyond production such as education and professional development. Individual demands for professional development have influenced the augmentation of recreational social media platforms as vicarious and functioning professional networks as well. The study’s purpose was to understand agricultural education teachers' perceived usefulness of professional social media use to better prepare themselves for positively impacting agricultural development. A random sample of secondary agriculture teachers responded to a self-administered survey instrument. New teachers perceived social media to be useful and also reported a greater number of minutes of use per week for professional purposes; this trend declined with increased years of teaching. Behaviors which teachers reported, in combination with their perceived usefulness and reported use, suggested professional social media use is supportive of andragogical assumptions. The elements of teachers’ professional learning network activitiesinstrument could serve as a valuable tool in explaining the variance in teachers’ professional social media use. Data can be used to inform the development of online professional learning experiences and in preparation of new professionals. Future research should explore the extent to which learning networks prepare agricultural preservice teachers and offer professional learning for practicing teachers to improve online and social media communications for all learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, J., Briers, G., Baker, M., Price, E., Djebou, D. C. S., Strong, R., Piña, M., & Kibriya, S. (2022). Food security and agricultural challenges in West-African rural communities: a machine learning analysis. International Journal of Food Properties, 25(1), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2022.2066124

Azorín, C., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). Taking a distributed perspective on leading professional learning networks. School Leadership & Management, 40(2–3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1647418

Chaleta, E., Saraiva, M., Leal, F., Fialho, I., Borralho, A. (2021). Higher education and sustainable development goals (SDG)—potential contribution of the undergraduate courses of the school of social sciences of the University of Évora. Sustainability, 13(4), 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041828

Chankseliani, M., & McCowan, T. (2021). Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education, 81, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w

Chiu, T. K. F., Chih-Yuan Sun, J., & Ismailov, M. (2022). Investigating the relationship of technology learning support to digital literacy from the perspective of self-determination theory. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2074966

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self- regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(17), 1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1052576

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Doleck, T., Lemay, D. J., & Brinton, C. G. (2021). Evaluating the efficiency of social learning networks: Perspectives for harnessing learning analytics to improve discussions. Computers & Education, 164, 104124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104124

Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6– 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954

Hillman, T., Lundin, M., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2021). Moderating professional learning on social media - A balance between monitoring, facilitation and expert membership. Computers & Education, 168, 104191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104191

Huynh, P. B., Murphrey, T. P., Dooley, K. E., Strong, R., & Dooley, L. M. (2019). An examination of postsecondary agricultural education instructors’ perspectives of the case study instructional technique and the development of a model to encourage use. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae/2019.03173

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.

Krutka, D. G., Carpenter, J. P., & Trust, T. (2016). Elements of engagement: A model of teacher interactions via professional learning networks. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(4), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1206492

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(863), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Li, Y., Sewell, D.K., Saber, S., Shank, D. B., & Kashima, Y. (2021). The climate commons dilemma: How can humanity solve the commons dilemma for the global climate commons? Climatic Change, 164(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02989-2

Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). The handling of nonresponse error in agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043

Luo, T., Freeman, C. & Stefaniak, J. (2020). “Like, comment, and share”—professional development through social media in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research Development, 68, 1659–1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5

Markham, M. J., Gentile, D., & Graham, D. L. (2018). Social media for networking, professional development, and patient engagement. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 37, 782–787. https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_180077

Mikwamba, K., Dessein, J., Kambewa, D., Messely, L., & Strong, R. (2021). Collaborative governance dynamics in innovation platforms: Case of Malawi’s district stakeholder panel. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1844767

Prestridge, S. (2019). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143– 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003

Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x

Ray, F. N. (2019). Pin it, share it, like it, retweet it: California agriculture teachers perceived usefulness of social media in their professional learning. [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University]. OAKTrust. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/187548

Seitz, P., Strong, R., Hague, S., & Murphrey, T. P. (2022). Evaluating agricultural extension agent’s sustainable cotton land production competencies: Subject matter discrepancies restricting farmers’ information adoption. Land, 11(11), 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112075

Strong, R., Wynn II, J. T., Lindner, J. R., & Palmer, K. (2022). Evaluating Brazilian agriculturalists’ IoT smart agriculture adoption barriers: Understanding stakeholder salience prior to launching an innovation. Sensors, 22(18), 6833. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186833

Strong, R., Dooley, L. M., Irby, T. L., & Snyder, L. U. (2014). Mexican banks’ acceptance and use of Twitter to assist in evaluating farm loan applications: Exploring the role of agricultural loans on food security. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 21(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2014.21204

Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). #TwitterforTeachers: The implications of Twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925694

Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 126, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.010

Zhou, W., Nakatsubo, F., Wu, J., & Liu, K. (2022). Digital ethnography of an online professional learning community based on WeChat for Chinese early childhood teachers. Computers & Education, 191, 104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104617